These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28852081)

  • 1. Robust seismicity forecasting based on Bayesian parameter estimation for epidemiological spatio-temporal aftershock clustering models.
    Ebrahimian H; Jalayer F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9803. PubMed ID: 28852081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvements to seismicity forecasting based on a Bayesian spatio-temporal ETAS model.
    Ebrahimian H; Jalayer F; Maleki Asayesh B; Hainzl S; Zafarani H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):20970. PubMed ID: 36470889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earthquake forecasting during the complex Amatrice-Norcia seismic sequence.
    Marzocchi W; Taroni M; Falcone G
    Sci Adv; 2017 Sep; 3(9):e1701239. PubMed ID: 28924610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion of epicenters of earthquake aftershocks, Omori's law, and generalized continuous-time random walk models.
    Helmstetter A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 Dec; 66(6 Pt 1):061104. PubMed ID: 12513267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seismicity Pattern Changes Prior to the 2008 Ms7.3 Yutian Earthquake.
    Huang Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33266834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity.
    Luginbuhl M; Rundle JB; Turcotte DL
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 Nov; 377(2136):. PubMed ID: 30478209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forecasting the magnitude of the largest expected earthquake.
    Shcherbakov R; Zhuang J; Zöller G; Ogata Y
    Nat Commun; 2019 Sep; 10(1):4051. PubMed ID: 31492839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Possible origin of memory in earthquakes: Real catalogs and an epidemic-type aftershock sequence model.
    Fan J; Zhou D; Shekhtman LM; Shapira A; Hofstetter R; Marzocchi W; Ashkenazy Y; Havlin S
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Apr; 99(4-1):042210. PubMed ID: 31108655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No evidence of magnitude clustering in an aftershock sequence of nano- and picoseismicity.
    Davidsen J; Kwiatek G; Dresen G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jan; 108(3):038501. PubMed ID: 22400793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Use of High-Resolution and Deep-Learning Seismic Catalogs for Short-Term Earthquake Forecasts: Potential Benefits and Current Limitations.
    Mancini S; Segou M; Werner MJ; Parsons T; Beroza G; Chiaraluce L
    J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2022 Nov; 127(11):e2022JB025202. PubMed ID: 36590904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The epistemic and aleatory uncertainties of the ETAS-type models: an application to the Central Italy seismicity.
    Lombardi AM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11812. PubMed ID: 28924175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of foreshocks and aftershocks of the nonconservative self-organized critical Olami-Feder-Christensen model.
    Helmstetter A; Hergarten S; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046120. PubMed ID: 15600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnitude-dependent epidemic-type aftershock sequences model for earthquakes.
    Spassiani I; Sebastiani G
    Phys Rev E; 2016 Apr; 93():042134. PubMed ID: 27176281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rare Occurrences of Non-cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California.
    Moutote L; Marsan D; Lengliné O; Duputel Z
    Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Apr; 48(7):e2020GL091757. PubMed ID: 34219839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?
    Langenbruch C; Zoback MD
    Sci Adv; 2016 Nov; 2(11):e1601542. PubMed ID: 28138533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is Seismicity Operating at a Critical Point?
    Nandan S; Ram SK; Ouillon G; Sornette D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2021 Mar; 126(12):128501. PubMed ID: 33834802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution of the largest aftershocks in branching models of triggered seismicity: theory of the universal Båth law.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 May; 71(5 Pt 2):056127. PubMed ID: 16089622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity.
    Post RAJ; Michels MAJ; Ampuero JP; Candela T; Fokker PA; van Wees JD; Hofstad RWV; Heuvel ERVD
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3540. PubMed ID: 33574409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu islands earthquake swarm that stressing rate governs seismicity.
    Toda S; Stein RS; Sagiya T
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6902):58-61. PubMed ID: 12214230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The New Madrid Seismic Zone: not dead yet.
    Page MT; Hough SE
    Science; 2014 Feb; 343(6172):762-4. PubMed ID: 24457216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.