292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28852356)
1. Detection of Retained Foreign Objects in Upper Extremity Surgical Procedures With Incisions of Two Centimeters or Smaller.
Tofte JN; Caldwell LS
Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():189-192. PubMed ID: 28852356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Safety of Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgical Procedures at a Freestanding Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Review of 28,737 Cases.
Goyal KS; Jain S; Buterbaugh GA; Imbriglia JE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):700-4. PubMed ID: 27098330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Resident Involvement on Outcomes and Costs in Elective Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.
Meyer MA; Tarabochia MA; Goh BC; Hietbrink F; Houwert RM; Dyer GSM
J Hand Surg Am; 2023 Aug; 48(8):788-795. PubMed ID: 35461739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retained foreign bodies after surgery.
Lincourt AE; Harrell A; Cristiano J; Sechrist C; Kercher K; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Apr; 138(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 17275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The retained surgical sponge.
Kaiser CW; Friedman S; Spurling KP; Slowick T; Kaiser HA
Ann Surg; 1996 Jul; 224(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8678622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study.
Steelman VM
Am J Surg; 2011 Feb; 201(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21266216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months.
Cima RR; Kollengode A; Clark J; Pool S; Weisbrod C; Amstutz GJ; Deschamps C
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2011 Feb; 37(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 21939132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical sponges in small animal surgery.
Zeltzman P; Downs M
Compend Contin Educ Vet; 2011 Jun; 33(6):E5. PubMed ID: 21870350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial.
Greenberg CC; Diaz-Flores R; Lipsitz SR; Regenbogen SE; Mulholland L; Mearn F; Rao S; Toidze T; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 18362623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.
Gawande AA; Studdert DM; Orav EJ; Brennan TA; Zinner MJ
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 12529464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The retained surgical sponge, an ongoing surgical problem].
Keeman JN
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Feb; 146(6):245-6. PubMed ID: 11865651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retained foreign body mimicking colon cancer.
Meyerson JM; Noria S; Melvin WS
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Aug; 22(4):e220-1. PubMed ID: 22874706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of factors associated with retained surgical sponges in veterinary patients: a survey of veterinary practitioners.
Rodriguez FR; Kirby BM; Ryan J
J Small Anim Pract; 2018 Sep; 59(9):570-577. PubMed ID: 29971789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
