BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28853106)

  • 1. Prognostic Role of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract.
    Mellouli M; Charfi S; Smaoui W; Kallel R; Khabir A; Bouacida M; Nabil Mhiri M; Sellami Boudawara T
    Urol J; 2017 Aug; 14(5):5008-5012. PubMed ID: 28853106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated surgically.
    Saito K; Kawakami S; Fujii Y; Sakura M; Masuda H; Kihara K
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2291-6; discussion 2296. PubMed ID: 17936818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic indicators for upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: the impact of lymphovascular invasion.
    Godfrey MS; Badalato GM; Hruby GW; Razmjoo M; McKiernan JM
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 22313599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between lymphovascular invasion and oncological outcome in node-negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma with different stage.
    Chen CS; Lin CY; Wang CL; Wang SS; Li JR; Yang CK; Cheng CL; Chiu KY; Yang SF
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 39(2):132.e13-132.e26. PubMed ID: 32900630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymphovascular invasion and pT stage are prognostic factors in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.
    Kim DS; Lee YH; Cho KS; Cho NH; Chung BH; Hong SJ
    Urology; 2010 Feb; 75(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 20018349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of lymphovascular invasion in predicting the prognosis of clinically localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (pT1-3cN0M0).
    Lin WC; Hu FC; Chung SD; Chueh SC; Pu YS; Huang KH
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):879-84; discussion 884-5. PubMed ID: 18635224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis.
    Cirulli GO; Corsi N; Rakic I; Stephens A; Chiarelli G; Finati M; Davis M; Tinsley S; Sood A; Buffi N; Lughezzani G; Carrieri G; Salonia A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rogers C; Abdollah F
    BJU Int; 2024 May; 133(5):555-563. PubMed ID: 38097533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
    Aboumohamed AA; Krane LS; Hemal AK
    J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 26192256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract.
    Hong B; Park S; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ro JY; Ahn H
    Urology; 2005 Apr; 65(4):692-6. PubMed ID: 15833510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraurothelial recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: preoperative predictors and survival.
    Dzamic Z; Milojevic B; Kajmakovic B; Grozdic Milojevic I; Bojanic N; Sipetic Grujicic S
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 May; 47(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 25772384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion after radical nephroureterectomy.
    Lee KS; Kim KH; Yoon YE; Choi KH; Yang SC; Han WK
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 25598935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is influenced by tumor location.
    Lee HY; Li CC; Huang CN; Ke HL; Li WM; Liang PI; Yang SF; Tu HP; Wu WJ; Yeh HC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1392-400. PubMed ID: 25239005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis.
    Danzig MR; Mallin K; McKiernan JM; Stadler WM; Sridhar SS; Morgan TM; Bochner BH; Lee CT
    Cancer; 2018 Jun; 124(12):2507-2514. PubMed ID: 29624636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.
    Hurel S; RouprĂȘt M; Ouzzane A; Rozet F; Xylinas E; Zerbib M; Berod AA; Ruffion A; Adam E; Cussenot O; Houlgatte A; PhĂ© V; Nouhaud FX; Bensadoun H; Delage F; Guillotreau J; Guy L; Karsenty G; De La Taille A; Colin P;
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1199-207. PubMed ID: 23650914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tumor necrosis predicts poor clinical outcomes in patients with node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
    Zhang XK; Zhang ZL; Yang P; Cai MY; Hu WM; Yun JP; Zhou FJ; Qian CN; Cao Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 45(11):1069-75. PubMed ID: 26355163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-institutional validation of the predictive value of Ki-67 in patients with high grade urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.
    Krabbe LM; Bagrodia A; Haddad AQ; Kapur P; Khalil D; Hynan LS; Wood CG; Karam JA; Weizer AZ; Raman JD; Remzi M; Rioux-Leclercq N; Haitel A; Roscigno M; Bolenz C; Bensalah K; Sagalowsky AI; Shariat SF; Lotan Y; Margulis V
    J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1486-93. PubMed ID: 25451830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Degree of hydronephrosis predicts adverse pathological features and worse oncologic outcomes in patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.
    Chung PH; Krabbe LM; Darwish OM; Westerman ME; Bagrodia A; Gayed BA; Haddad AQ; Kapur P; Sagalowsky AI; Lotan Y; Margulis V
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 32(7):981-8. PubMed ID: 25022858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of variant histology on disease aggressiveness and outcome after nephroureterectomy in Japanese patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
    Sakano S; Matsuyama H; Kamiryo Y; Hayashida S; Yamamoto N; Kaneda Y; Nasu T; Baba Y; Shimabukuro T; Suga A; Yamamoto M; Aoki A; Takai K; Yoshihiro S; Oba K;
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 20(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 24964974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of histological variants on clinical outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
    Rink M; Robinson BD; Green DA; Cha EK; Hansen J; Comploj E; Margulis V; Raman JD; Ng CK; Remzi M; Bensalah K; Kabbani W; Haitel A; Rioux-Leclercq N; Guo CC; Chun FK; Kikuchi E; Kassouf W; Sircar K; Sun M; Sonpavde G; Lotan Y; Pycha A; Karakiewicz PI; Scherr DS; Shariat SF
    J Urol; 2012 Aug; 188(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 22698626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in upper urinary tract carcinoma: a retrospective monocentric analysis].
    Colin P; Verhasselt-Crinquette M; Ouzzane A; Yakoubi R; Bouchery C; Debrock S; Fantoni JC; Villers A; Leroy X
    Prog Urol; 2010 May; 22(6):331-8. PubMed ID: 22541902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.