288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28853220)
1. Hemodynamic Evaluation of a Biological and Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis Using Patient-Specific MRI-Based CFD.
Hellmeier F; Nordmeyer S; Yevtushenko P; Bruening J; Berger F; Kuehne T; Goubergrits L; Kelm M
Artif Organs; 2018 Jan; 42(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28853220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bileaflet mechanical aortic valves do not alter ascending aortic wall shear stress.
Farag ES; Schade EL; van Ooij P; Boekholdt SM; Planken RN; van Kimmenade R; Nederveen AJ; de Mol BAJM; Kluin J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):703-710. PubMed ID: 30741363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Trauzeddel RF; Barker AJ; Gruettner H; Markl M; Schulz-Menger J
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 170(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 24315151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.
Oechtering TH; Hons CF; Sieren M; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Drexl J; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 152(2):418-427.e1. PubMed ID: 27423836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential flow improvements after valve replacements in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment.
Bissell MM; Loudon M; Hess AT; Stoll V; Orchard E; Neubauer S; Myerson SG
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29422054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Aortic Wall Deformation with Healthy and Calcified Annulus on Hemodynamic Performance of Implanted On-X Valve.
Sadipour M; Hanafizadeh P; Sadeghy K; Sattari A
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Apr; 11(2):141-161. PubMed ID: 31912432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses.
van Kesteren F; Wollersheim LW; Baan J; Nederveen AJ; Kaya A; Boekholdt SM; de Mol BA; van Ooij P; Planken RN
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):257-264. PubMed ID: 28710578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Oechtering TH; Sieren MM; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 159(3):798-810.e1. PubMed ID: 31078313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Greater asymmetric wall shear stress in Sievers' type 1/LR compared with 0/LAT bicuspid aortic valves after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Stephens EH; Hope TA; Kari FA; Kvitting JP; Liang DH; Herfkens RJ; Miller DC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jul; 150(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25956338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study.
Sieren MM; Schultz V; Fujita B; Wegner F; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A; Oechtering TH
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Aug; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 32772927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the mitral valve prosthesis adversely affect the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients with double valve replacement?
Spiliotopoulos K; Armstrong S; Maganti M; David TE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S74-7. PubMed ID: 22104672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Hemodynamics After Aortic Root Replacement Using Valve-Sparing or Bioprosthetic Valved Conduit.
Collins JD; Semaan E; Barker A; McCarthy PM; Carr JC; Markl M; Malaisrie SC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Nov; 100(5):1556-62. PubMed ID: 26212514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: surgical consideration.
Matsue H; Sawa Y; Takahashi T; Matsumiya G; Ohtake S; Hamada S; Ueguchi T; Matsuda H
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):60-6. PubMed ID: 11805951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of Valve Prostheses.
Rosu C; Soltesz EG
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015; 27(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 26686441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve implantation in 120 patients.
Eichstaedt HC; Easo J; Härle T; Dapunt OE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):370-5. PubMed ID: 23473011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Can We Help a Patient With a Small Failing Bioprosthesis?: An In Vitro Case Study.
Midha PA; Raghav V; Condado JF; Arjunon S; Uceda DE; Lerakis S; Thourani VH; Babaliaros V; Yoganathan AP
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(15):2026-2033. PubMed ID: 26627992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
