These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28853716)

  • 1. Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Nov; 119(5):302-313. PubMed ID: 28853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.
    Csilléry K; Johnson T; Beraldi D; Clutton-Brock T; Coltman D; Hansson B; Spong G; Pemberton JM
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2091-101. PubMed ID: 16783017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.
    Bink MC; Anderson AD; van de Weg WE; Thompson EA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Oct; 117(6):843-55. PubMed ID: 18592205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual identification from genetic marker data: developments and accuracy comparisons of methods.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 26230747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
    Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2002 Mar; 160(3):1203-15. PubMed ID: 11901134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of single-sample estimators of effective population sizes from genetic marker data.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4692-711. PubMed ID: 27288989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demerelate: calculating interindividual relatedness for kinship analysis based on codominant diploid genetic markers using R.
    Kraemer P; Gerlach G
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 28281323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating Relatedness in the Presence of Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Dunn DW; Qi X; Guo S; Li B
    Genetics; 2016 Jan; 202(1):247-60. PubMed ID: 26500259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moment estimators of relatedness from low-depth whole-genome sequencing data.
    Herzig AF; Ciullo M; ; Leutenegger AL; Perdry H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):254. PubMed ID: 35751014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The computer program structure for assigning individuals to populations: easy to use but easier to misuse.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):981-990. PubMed ID: 28028941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do marker-based paternity assignments favour heterozygous and unrelated males?
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 May; 19(9):1898-913. PubMed ID: 20345688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding coefficients: an assessment of current methods.
    Wang J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):518-30. PubMed ID: 24444019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.