These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28853716)

  • 21. Purging putative siblings from population genetic data sets: a cautionary view.
    Waples RS; Anderson EC
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1211-1224. PubMed ID: 28099771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.
    Van de Casteele T; Galbusera P; Matthysen E
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Jun; 10(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 11412374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.
    Anderson AD; Weir BS
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):421-40. PubMed ID: 17339212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.
    Toro MA; García-Cortés LA; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21749687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating Allele Frequencies.
    Adrianto I; Montgomery C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():61-81. PubMed ID: 28980242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias.
    Attard CRM; Beheregaray LB; Möller LM
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):381-390. PubMed ID: 29160928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 12755885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Kernel density estimation of allele frequency including undetected alleles.
    Aoki S; Fukasawa K
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17248. PubMed ID: 38666077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating Seven Coefficients of Pairwise Relatedness Using Population-Genomic Data.
    Ackerman MS; Johri P; Spitze K; Xu S; Doak TG; Young K; Lynch M
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 28341647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation.
    Chapuis MP; Estoup A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Mar; 24(3):621-31. PubMed ID: 17150975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A maximum-likelihood estimation of pairwise relatedness for autopolyploids.
    Huang K; Guo ST; Shattuck MR; Chen ST; Qi XG; Zhang P; Li BG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Feb; 114(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 25370210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genotype-free estimation of allele frequencies reduces bias and improves demographic inference from RADSeq data.
    Warmuth VM; Ellegren H
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 May; 19(3):586-596. PubMed ID: 30633448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A pairwise relatedness estimator for polyploids.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Guo S; Shattuck M; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Jul; 14(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 24460904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating variance components in natural populations using inferred relationships.
    Thomas SC; Pemberton JM; Hill WG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Apr; 84 ( Pt 4)():427-36. PubMed ID: 10849066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation.
    Tallmon DA; Luikart G; Beaumont MA
    Genetics; 2004 Jun; 167(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 15238546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.
    Lynch M; Ritland K
    Genetics; 1999 Aug; 152(4):1753-66. PubMed ID: 10430599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unbiased estimator for genetic drift and effective population size.
    Jorde PE; Ryman N
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):927-35. PubMed ID: 17720927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.