BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28855376)

  • 1. Destabilization of the replication fork protection complex disrupts meiotic chromosome segregation.
    Escorcia W; Forsburg SL
    Mol Biol Cell; 2017 Nov; 28(22):2978-2997. PubMed ID: 28855376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fission yeast Swi1-Swi3 complex facilitates DNA binding of Mrc1.
    Tanaka T; Yokoyama M; Matsumoto S; Fukatsu R; You Z; Masai H
    J Biol Chem; 2010 Dec; 285(51):39609-22. PubMed ID: 20924116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RFCCtf18 and the Swi1-Swi3 complex function in separate and redundant pathways required for the stabilization of replication forks to facilitate sister chromatid cohesion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Ansbach AB; Noguchi C; Klansek IW; Heidlebaugh M; Nakamura TM; Noguchi E
    Mol Biol Cell; 2008 Feb; 19(2):595-607. PubMed ID: 18045993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1, Swi3, and Hsk1 are components of a novel S-phase response pathway to alkylation damage.
    Sommariva E; Pellny TK; Karahan N; Kumar S; Huberman JA; Dalgaard JZ
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Apr; 25(7):2770-84. PubMed ID: 15767681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Replication fork stability is essential for the maintenance of centromere integrity in the absence of heterochromatin.
    Li PC; Petreaca RC; Jensen A; Yuan JP; Green MD; Forsburg SL
    Cell Rep; 2013 Mar; 3(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 23478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Swi1 associates with chromatin through the DDT domain and recruits Swi3 to preserve genomic integrity.
    Noguchi C; Rapp JB; Skorobogatko YV; Bailey LD; Noguchi E
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43988. PubMed ID: 22952839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Translesion synthesis polymerases contribute to meiotic chromosome segregation and cohesin dynamics in
    Mastro TL; Tripathi VP; Forsburg SL
    J Cell Sci; 2020 May; 133(10):. PubMed ID: 32317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mcp7, a meiosis-specific coiled-coil protein of fission yeast, associates with Meu13 and is required for meiotic recombination.
    Saito TT; Tougan T; Kasama T; Okuzaki D; Nojima H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004; 32(11):3325-39. PubMed ID: 15210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast.
    Noguchi E; Noguchi C; McDonald WH; Yates JR; Russell P
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Oct; 24(19):8342-55. PubMed ID: 15367656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fission yeast Cid12 has dual functions in chromosome segregation and checkpoint control.
    Win TZ; Stevenson AL; Wang SW
    Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Jun; 26(12):4435-47. PubMed ID: 16738311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis.
    Watanabe Y; Nurse P
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6743):461-4. PubMed ID: 10440376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spo13 maintains centromeric cohesion and kinetochore coorientation during meiosis I.
    Lee BH; Kiburz BM; Amon A
    Curr Biol; 2004 Dec; 14(24):2168-82. PubMed ID: 15620644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S332.
    Katis VL; Galova M; Rabitsch KP; Gregan J; Nasmyth K
    Curr Biol; 2004 Apr; 14(7):560-72. PubMed ID: 15062096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-meiotic S phase is linked to reductional chromosome segregation and recombination.
    Watanabe Y; Yokobayashi S; Yamamoto M; Nurse P
    Nature; 2001 Jan; 409(6818):359-63. PubMed ID: 11201746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spo13 facilitates monopolin recruitment to kinetochores and regulates maintenance of centromeric cohesion during yeast meiosis.
    Katis VL; Matos J; Mori S; Shirahige K; Zachariae W; Nasmyth K
    Curr Biol; 2004 Dec; 14(24):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15620645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Only connect: linking meiotic DNA replication to chromosome dynamics.
    Forsburg SL
    Mol Cell; 2002 Apr; 9(4):703-11. PubMed ID: 11983163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coordinated degradation of replisome components ensures genome stability upon replication stress in the absence of the replication fork protection complex.
    Roseaulin LC; Noguchi C; Martinez E; Ziegler MA; Toda T; Noguchi E
    PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(1):e1003213. PubMed ID: 23349636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genes Important for
    Blyth J; Makrantoni V; Barton RE; Spanos C; Rappsilber J; Marston AL
    Genetics; 2018 Feb; 208(2):589-603. PubMed ID: 29259000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recombination at DNA replication fork barriers is not universal and is differentially regulated by Swi1.
    Pryce DW; Ramayah S; Jaendling A; McFarlane RJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Mar; 106(12):4770-5. PubMed ID: 19273851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sap1 promotes the association of the replication fork protection complex with chromatin and is involved in the replication checkpoint in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Noguchi C; Noguchi E
    Genetics; 2007 Feb; 175(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 17151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.