These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28855751)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of three methods to measure working length - Manual tactile sensation, digital radiograph, and multidetector computed tomography: An
    Dutta K; Desai PD; Das UK; Sarkar S
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 28855751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of endodontic working length determination using cone beam computed tomography.
    Connert T; Hülber-J M; Godt A; Löst C; ElAyouti A
    Int Endod J; 2014 Jul; 47(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 24134733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
    Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ex vivo evaluation of the ability of four different electronic apex locators to determine the working length in teeth with various foramen diameters.
    Ebrahim AK; Wadachi R; Suda H
    Aust Dent J; 2006 Sep; 51(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 17037894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by three electronic root canal length measurement devices integrated into endodontic rotary motors.
    Ali MM; Wigler R; Lin S; Kaufman AY
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2303-2308. PubMed ID: 27392613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction.
    Williams CB; Joyce AP; Roberts S
    J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):624-7. PubMed ID: 16793467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of Working Length of Root Canal.
    Sharma MC; Arora V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2010 Jul; 66(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 27408308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical evaluation of the voltage gradient method for root canal measurement].
    Nakamura M; Nakamura Y
    Shigaku; 1989 Oct; 77(3):930-48. PubMed ID: 2489340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.
    Somma F; Castagnola R; Lajolo C; Paternò Holtzman L; Marigo L
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 22257341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Micro-CT Study of the In Vivo Accuracy of a Wireless Electronic Apex Locator.
    De-Deus G; Cozer V; Souza EM; Silva EJNL; Wigler R; Belladonna FG; Simões-Carvalho M; Versiani MA
    J Endod; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1152-1160. PubMed ID: 35780927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Electronic Apex Locator, Digital Radiography, and Conventional Radiographic Method for Root Canal Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: An
    Sahni A; Kapoor R; Gandhi K; Kumar D; Datta G; Malhotra R
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 33623342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo determination of root canal length: a preliminary report using the Tri Auto ZX apex-locating handpiece.
    Grimberg F; Banegas G; Chiacchio L; Zmener O
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):590-3. PubMed ID: 12190898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the accuracy of apex locator, digital radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography in root canal working length determination in teeth with external root resorption: An
    Hasheminia SM; Jahadi S; Moghaddam FG; Bagherieh S
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2024; 21():8. PubMed ID: 38425325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.