These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 288560)

  • 1. [Comparative study on the abrasion behavior of composite filling materials].
    Soltész U; Klaiber B; Pergande C; Richter H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 May; 34(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 288560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Abrasion measurements in vivo in occlusal composite and amalgam fillings].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Sep; 33(9):617-22. PubMed ID: 279445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Brush abrasion with 27 commercial composites and their surface changes in the scanning electron microscope].
    Soltész U; Klaiber B; Schlude V
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):502-5. PubMed ID: 6931812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influences of composition on brush wear of composite resins. Influences of particle size and content of filler].
    Yuasa S
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):659-78. PubMed ID: 2134832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the lateral dental region].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Mar; 33(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 274270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite.
    Clelland NL; Pagnotto MP; Kerby RE; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15674226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative in vivo wear-resistance measurements between amalgam and composite materials. Results after 2 years].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 6931810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 16268397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear of dental amalgam.
    Roberts JC; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1977 Jul; 11(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 873943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strengths of repaired laboratory composites using three surface treatments and three primers.
    Trajtenberg CP; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15151340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the area of the lateral teeth].
    Mettler P; Friedrich U; Roulet JF
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1978 Apr; 88(4):324-44. PubMed ID: 349684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should I be using amalgam or composite restorative materials?
    Phillips RW
    Int Dent J; 1975 Dec; 25(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 1058835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of retentive filler and its use in dentistry.
    Xu HC; Wang T; Heindl D; Zheng G; Liu WY; Nagel JR
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Sep; 1(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 10557187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-body abrasion of commercial and experimental restorative and coating resins and an amalgam.
    Powers JM; Allen LJ; Craig RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1118-22. PubMed ID: 4610026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion.
    Cavalcante LM; Masouras K; Watts DC; Pimenta LA; Silikas N
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19281115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites.
    Debnath S; Ranade R; Wunder SL; McCool J; Boberick K; Baran G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 15236943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The degree of conversion of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized using different light-curing sources.
    Uctasli S; Tezvergil A; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 15826704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.