These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28856199)

  • 21. Evaluation of the Atellica
    Aper SJA; Gijzen K; Luimstra JJ; van der Valk JTMH; Russcher A; Koçer RG; Liesting EC; Jacobs LHJ; Lentjes EGWM; Demir AY
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2021 Nov; 81(7):585-592. PubMed ID: 34686074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal criteria for microscopic review of urinalysis following use of automated urine analyzer.
    Khejonnit V; Pratumvinit B; Reesukumal K; Meepanya S; Pattanavin C; Wongkrajang P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jan; 439():1-4. PubMed ID: 25280641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.
    Wah DT; Wises PK; Butch AW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 15842056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical laboratory urine analysis: comparison of the UriSed automated microscopic analyzer and the manual microscopy.
    Ma J; Wang C; Yue J; Li M; Zhang H; Ma X; Li X; Xue D; Qing X; Wang S; Xiang D; Cong Y
    Clin Lab; 2013; 59(11-12):1297-303. PubMed ID: 24409664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Benefits of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser in routine urinalysis.
    van den Broek D; Keularts IM; Wielders JP; Kraaijenhagen RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(11):1635-40. PubMed ID: 19012529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The efficient workflow to decrease the manual microscopic examination of urine sediment using on-screen review of images.
    Cho EJ; Ko DH; Lee W; Chun S; Lee HK; Min WK
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jun; 56():70-74. PubMed ID: 29655959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer.
    Ben-Ezra J; Bork L; McPherson RA
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jan; 44(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 9550564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28.
    Nikler A; Radišić Biljak V; Čičak H; Marić N; Bejuk D; Poloni JAT; Simundic AM
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Oct; 29(3):030801. PubMed ID: 31624465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Manual urine microscopy versus automated urine analyzer microscopy in patients with acute kidney injury.
    Sharda N; Bakhtar O; Thajudeen B; Meister E; Szerlip H
    Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):e152-5. PubMed ID: 25425026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sysmex UF-5000 Automatic Urine Sediment Analyzer Can Improve the Accuracy of Epithelial Cell Detection.
    Chen Y; Zhang Z; Lin Z; Wu Y; Zhao Y; Wang G; Jing J
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2021 Jul; 51(4):562-569. PubMed ID: 34452897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the fully automated urine particle analyzer UF-1500.
    Morita Y; Yokoyama R; Tanaka M; Nakatsuka N; Hisasue T; Ono Y; Kurano M
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2023 Dec; 37(23-24):e24993. PubMed ID: 38041489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The rate of manual microscopic examination of urine sediment: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 11,243 urinalysis tests from 88 institutions.
    Tworek JA; Wilkinson DS; Walsh MK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 132(12):1868-73. PubMed ID: 19061282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of FUS-2000 urine analyzer: analytical properties and particle recognition.
    Beňovská M; Wiewiorka O; Pinkavová J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2018; 78(1-2):143-148. PubMed ID: 29310458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Evaluation of the performances of the iQ(®)200 ELITE automated urine microscopy analyser and comparison with manual microscopy method].
    Dewulf G; Harrois D; Mazars E; Cattoen C; Canis F
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2011 Oct; 59(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 19942378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mid-stream vs. first-voided urine collection by using automated analyzers for particle examination in healthy subjects: an Italian multicenter study.
    Manoni F; Gessoni G; Alessio MG; Caleffi A; Saccani G; Silvestri MG; Poz D; Ercolin M; Tinello A; Valverde S; Ottomano C; Lippi G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(4):679-84. PubMed ID: 22505530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Urine sediment analysis by the Yellow IRIS automated urinalysis workstation.
    Wargotz ES; Hyde JE; Karcher DS; Hitlan JP; Wilkinson DS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Dec; 88(6):746-8. PubMed ID: 3687846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance Evaluation of Three URiSCAN Devices for Routine Urinalysis.
    Ko K; Kwon MJ; Ryu S; Woo HY; Park H
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep; 30(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 26303237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D; Cong Y; Wang C; Yue J; Ma X; Lu Y; Liu P; Ma J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consistency analysis of the Sysmex UF-5000 and Atellica UAS 800 urine sedimentation analyzers.
    Liu H; Li Q; Zhang Y; Huang D; Yu F
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2022 Sep; 36(9):e24659. PubMed ID: 35971777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preliminary evaluation of the Iris IQ 200 automated urine analyser.
    Alves L; Ballester F; Camps J; Joven J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(9):967-70. PubMed ID: 16176179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.