These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28856865)

  • 1. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension with suture line instead of mesh.
    Liang J; Chen G; Deng L; Liu FJ; Wu LJ; Li Q; Shen X; Yang YJ; Ling B
    BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124 Suppl 3():64-70. PubMed ID: 28856865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse.
    Chen G; Wu D; Zhao W; Hu W; Li J; Ling B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):887-91. PubMed ID: 22249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse.
    Chen G; Ling B; Li J; Xu P; Hu W; Zhao W; Wu D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 20598651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):28-34. PubMed ID: 29673691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sling suspension: a new technique of treating uterine prolapse].
    Liang H; Chen G; Yu H; Sun A; Zhao W; Ling B
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 94(21):1664-6. PubMed ID: 25152294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
    Doğan O; Yassa M; Eren E; Birol İlter P; Tuğ N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.
    Peng J; Li S; Wang L; Yang L; Nai M; Xu Q; Jin Y; Liu P; Li L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18519. PubMed ID: 37898708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension technique for post hysterectomy apical prolapse in 472 women: results from a longitudinal clinical study.
    Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Thomas E; Schierlitz L
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 30461171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
    Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mesh-less laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear suspension treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Wang W; Liang H; Yu H; Rong C; Dong Y; Xue M; Liu X; Liang J; Ling B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 May; 296():275-279. PubMed ID: 38493551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Retrospective Cohort Study of vNOTES Extraperitoneal Versus Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy With Uterine Preserving Regarding Surgical Outcomes and Two-Year Follow-Up Results.
    Dou Y; Deng L; Liang X; Cao F; Chen B; Tang S; Wang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):584-591. PubMed ID: 38642887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension: a novel procedure to repair uterine prolapse.
    Dai Z; Li H; Shu H; Guan X; Zhang K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):657-660. PubMed ID: 30361770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medium-term outcomes after combined trachelectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension among young women with severe uterine prolapse.
    Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 132(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 26613824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficacy of bilateral mesh sacrospinous ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with metroptosis.
    Wang G; Li Q; HonglingXu ; Zhao Z; Wang D; Zhang Y; Gao L; Chen Z
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18367. PubMed ID: 39112592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.