154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28857116)
1. Methodology for Computational Fluid Dynamic Validation for Medical Use: Application to Intracranial Aneurysm.
Paliwal N; Damiano RJ; Varble NA; Tutino VM; Dou Z; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Dec; 139(12):1210041-12100410. PubMed ID: 28857116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A pilot validation of CFD model results against PIV observations of haemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents.
Li Y; Verrelli DI; Yang W; Qian Y; Chong W
J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109590. PubMed ID: 31902608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of patient-specific hemodynamic models of stented intracranial aneurysms: report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2011.
Cito S; Geers AJ; Arroyo MP; Palero VR; Pallarés J; Vernet A; Blasco J; San Román L; Fu W; Qiao A; Janiga G; Miura Y; Ohta M; Mendina M; Usera G; Frangi AF
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 43(1):154-67. PubMed ID: 25118668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review on the reliability of hemodynamic modeling in intracranial aneurysms: why computational fluid dynamics alone cannot solve the equation.
Berg P; Saalfeld S; Voß S; Beuing O; Janiga G
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E15. PubMed ID: 31261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge.
Valen-Sendstad K; Bergersen AW; Shimogonya Y; Goubergrits L; Bruening J; Pallares J; Cito S; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Geers AJ; Larrabide I; Rapaka S; Mihalef V; Fu W; Qiao A; Jain K; Roller S; Mardal KA; Kamakoti R; Spirka T; Ashton N; Revell A; Aristokleous N; Houston JG; Tsuji M; Ishida F; Menon PG; Browne LD; Broderick S; Shojima M; Koizumi S; Barbour M; Aliseda A; Morales HG; Lefèvre T; Hodis S; Al-Smadi YM; Tran JS; Marsden AL; Vaippummadhom S; Einstein GA; Brown AG; Debus K; Niizuma K; Rashad S; Sugiyama SI; Owais Khan M; Updegrove AR; Shadden SC; Cornelissen BMW; Majoie CBLM; Berg P; Saalfield S; Kono K; Steinman DA
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):544-564. PubMed ID: 30203115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Automated Workflow for Hemodynamic Computations in Cerebral Aneurysms.
Nita CI; Suzuki T; Itu LM; Mihalef V; Takao H; Murayama Y; Sharma P; Redel T; Rapaka S
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():5954617. PubMed ID: 32655681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms: Comparing accuracy of CFD solvers based on finite element and finite volume schemes.
Botti L; Paliwal N; Conti P; Antiga L; Meng H
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 34(9):e3111. PubMed ID: 29858530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations.
Hoi Y; Woodward SH; Kim M; Taulbee DB; Meng H
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 17154684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Human Pulmonary Arteries with Experimental Validation.
Bordones AD; Leroux M; Kheyfets VO; Wu YA; Chen CY; Finol EA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29786774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardized viscosity as a source of error in computational fluid dynamic simulations of cerebral aneurysms.
Fillingham P; Belur N; Sweem R; Barbour MC; Marsh LMM; Aliseda A; Levitt MR
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1499-1508. PubMed ID: 38150511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A verified and validated moving domain computational fluid dynamics solver with applications to cardiovascular flows.
Kjeldsberg HA; Sundnes J; Valen-Sendstad K
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 39(6):e3703. PubMed ID: 37020156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom-based experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations on cerebral aneurysms.
Sun Q; Groth A; Bertram M; Waechter I; Bruijns T; Hermans R; Aach T
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):5054-65. PubMed ID: 20964225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CFD validation using in-vitro MRI velocity data - Methods for data matching and CFD error quantification.
Wüstenhagen C; John K; Langner S; Brede M; Grundmann S; Bruschewski M
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104230. PubMed ID: 33545507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling of contrast transport in basilar aneurysms following flow-altering surgeries.
Vali A; Abla AA; Lawton MT; Saloner D; Rayz VL
J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 50():195-201. PubMed ID: 27890537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative comparison of hemodynamics in simulated and 3D angiography models of cerebral aneurysms by use of computational fluid dynamics.
Saho T; Onishi H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jul; 8(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 25911446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
