These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28857193)

  • 1. Technical Note: DoseMapper: A validated GUI-based exact numerical modeling method of shielding in PET/CT facilities.
    Hermansen JS; Fonslet J; Søndergaard LR
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):6053-6060. PubMed ID: 28857193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of self-absorption on PET and PET/CT shielding requirements.
    Elschot M; de Wit TC; de Jong HW
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2999-3007. PubMed ID: 20632612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PShield: an exact three-dimensional numerical solution for determining optimal shielding designs for PET/CT facilities.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3060-9. PubMed ID: 22755691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of computed tomography shielding design methods using RadShield.
    DeLorenzo MC; Yang K; Wu DH; Wang W; Rutel IB
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Jun; 37(2):492-505. PubMed ID: 28397710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mathematical modeling of the radiation dose received from photons passing over and through shielding walls in a PET/CT suite.
    Fog LS; Cormack J
    Health Phys; 2010 Dec; 99(6):769-79. PubMed ID: 21068595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of various methods for designing the shielding from ionising radiation at PET-CTinstallations.
    Antić V; Stanković K; Vujisić M; Osmokrović P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Apr; 154(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 22899217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RadShield: semiautomated shielding design using a floor plan driven graphical user interface.
    DeLorenzo MC; Wu DH; Yang K; Rutel IB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):509-522. PubMed ID: 27685128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of AAPM TG-108 PET/CT shielding recommendations to measurements in an oncology center.
    Nye JA; Dubose M; Votaw JR
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5017-21. PubMed ID: 19994511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose around a PET scanner installation: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations, analytical calculations and experimental results.
    Lo Meo S; Cicoria G; Campanella F; Mattozzi M; Panebianco AS; Marengo M
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 24440536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities.
    Zanzonico P; Dauer L; St Germain J
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):554-70. PubMed ID: 18849690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of shielding calculation methods for 16- and 64-slice computed tomography facilities.
    Moreno C; Cenizo E; Bodineau C; Mateo B; Ortega EM
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Sep; 30(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 20826895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AAPM Task Group 108: PET and PET/CT shielding requirements.
    Madsen MT; Anderson JA; Halama JR; Kleck J; Simpkin DJ; Votaw JR; Wendt RE; Williams LE; Yester MV
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 16485403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of shielding on pelvic and abdominal IORT dose distributions.
    Esposito A; Sakellaris T; Limede P; Costa F; Cunha LT; Dias AG; Lencart J; Sarmento S; Rosa CC
    Phys Med; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 27780674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of shielding calculation methods for multi-slice computed tomography (CT) systems.
    Cole JA; Platten DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 19029585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of a flattening filter free linear accelerator on structural shielding design.
    Jank J; Kragl G; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 23763984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal radiation doses in PET/CT facility: measurements vs. calculations.
    Hippeläinen E; Nikkinen P; Ihalainen T; Uusi-Simola J; Savolainen S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18713782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Protection of eye lens in computed tomography--dose evaluation on an anthropomorphic phantom using thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Monte-Carlo simulations].
    Keil B; Wulff J; Schmitt R; Auvanis D; Danova D; Heverhagen JT; Fiebich M; Madsack B; Leppek R; Klose KJ; Zink K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1047-53. PubMed ID: 19235699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different methods for shielding design in computed tomography.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Arandjic D; Kosutic D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 21743070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model-based approach of scatter dose contributions and efficiency of apron shielding for radiation protection in CT.
    Weber N; Monnin P; Elandoy C; Ding S
    Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):889-896. PubMed ID: 26112350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of patient dose reduction by bismuth shielding in CT using measurements, GEANT4 and MCNPX simulations.
    Mendes M; Costa F; Figueira C; Madeira P; Teles P; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):175-81. PubMed ID: 25813483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.