These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28857234)

  • 1. Does mock exercise improve students' oral examination skills?
    Ghias K; Jilani T; Jabeen K; Ahmed R
    Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 51(11):1162. PubMed ID: 28857234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Employing oral examinations (viva voce) in assessing dental students' clinical reasoning skills.
    Ryding HA; Murphy HJ
    J Dent Educ; 1999 Sep; 63(9):682-7. PubMed ID: 10518205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. OSCE as a tool for evaluation of practical semiology in comparison to MCQ & oral examination.
    Dadgar SR; Saleh A; Bahador H; Baradaran HR
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):506-7. PubMed ID: 18846801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A CRASH course in procedural skills improves medical students' self-assessment of proficiency, confidence, and anxiety.
    Stewart RA; Hauge LS; Stewart RD; Rosen RL; Charnot-Katsikas A; Prinz RA;
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):771-3. PubMed ID: 17512294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical Students' Perception of OSCE at the Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, KSA.
    Elfaki OA; Al-Humayed S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Feb; 26(2):158-9. PubMed ID: 26876409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Educational impact of an assessment of medical students' collaboration in health care teams.
    Olupeliyawa A; Balasooriya C; Hughes C; O'Sullivan A
    Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 48(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 24528397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback on medical students' performance valued.
    Sepdham D; Morrow J; Dobbie A
    Fam Med; 2008; 40(7):463-4. PubMed ID: 18928071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students' communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity.
    Hulsman RL; van der Vloodt J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Mar; 98(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 25433967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Framework for feedback: the peer mini-clinical examination as a formative assessment tool.
    Bennett D; Kelly M; O'Flynn S
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):512. PubMed ID: 22515770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Videotaped simulated interviews to improve medical students' skills in disclosing a diagnosis of cancer.
    Bonnaud-Antignac A; Campion L; Pottier P; Supiot S
    Psychooncology; 2010 Sep; 19(9):975-81. PubMed ID: 19918865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance.
    Parkes J; Abercrombie S; McCarty T
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 22581568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the accuracy of self-assessment of practical clinical skills using video feedback--the importance of including benchmarks.
    Hawkins SC; Osborne A; Schofield SJ; Pournaras DJ; Chester JF
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22455696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do clinical interview transcripts generated by speech recognition software improve clinical reasoning performance in mock patient encounters? A prospective observational study.
    Shikino K; Tsukamoto T; Noda K; Ohira Y; Yokokawa D; Hirose Y; Sato E; Mito T; Ota T; Katsuyama Y; Uehara T; Ikusaka M
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):272. PubMed ID: 37085837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Final year MBBS students' perception for observed structured clinical examination.
    Siddiqui FG
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23286618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Too much small talk? Medical students' pelvic examination skills falter with pleasant patients.
    Posner GD; Hamstra SJ
    Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 47(12):1209-14. PubMed ID: 24206154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
    Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasoning when it counts: students' rationales for action on a professionalism exam.
    Ginsburg SR; Regehr G; Mylopoulos M
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S40-3. PubMed ID: 17895688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interactive examination: assessing students' self-assessment ability.
    Mattheos N; Nattestad A; Falk-Nilsson E; Attström R
    Med Educ; 2004 Apr; 38(4):378-89. PubMed ID: 15025639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do gender and anxiety affect students' self-assessment and actual performance on a high-stakes clinical skills examination?
    Colbert-Getz JM; Fleishman C; Jung J; Shilkofski N
    Acad Med; 2013 Jan; 88(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 23165273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using OSCEs to test students' documentation skills.
    Farooqi M; Aljibury O; Arfeen F; Syed U; Cheema H; Choudri M
    Clin Teach; 2017 Feb; 14(1):65-67. PubMed ID: 26990363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.