311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28858044)
1. Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):986-992. PubMed ID: 28858044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring intraocular pressure after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation with rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Diaz-Valle D; Garcia-Feijoo J
Cornea; 2015 May; 34(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 25826325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments.
Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Mendez-Fernandez R; Saenz-Frances F; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27661992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification.
Kiddee W; Tanjana A
J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):317-324. PubMed ID: 33137014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas.
Ozbek Z; Cohen EJ; Hammersmith KM; Rapuano CJ
Cornea; 2006 Sep; 25(8):890-4. PubMed ID: 17102662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Axial Length on Intraocular Pressure Measurement With Three Tonometers in Childhood Glaucoma.
Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Sanchez Jean R; Garcia-Feljoo J
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Jan; 57(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 31972037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers.
Gkika MG; Labiris G; Kozobolis VP
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 21574162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
