310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28858044)
21. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tonopen XL, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Yildiz I; Altan C; Çakmak S; Genc S; Yildirim Y; Agca A
J Glaucoma; 2022 Nov; 31(11):909-914. PubMed ID: 35939831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Özcura F; Yildirim N; Şahin A; Çolak E
Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 25938044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers.
Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intradevice and Interdevice Agreement Between a Rebound Tonometer, Icare PRO, and the Tonopen XL and Kowa Hand-held Applanation Tonometer When Used in the Sitting and Supine Position.
Nakakura S; Mori E; Yamamoto M; Tsushima Y; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
J Glaucoma; 2015 Sep; 24(7):515-21. PubMed ID: 24145289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between different tonometers following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation.
Elfwwal MM; Elbasty MK; Khattab MF; ElShazly MI
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34472983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Agreement among Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Easyton Transpalpebral Tonometer, Tonopen, and Icare in Patients with Keratoconus.
Yildiz MB; Kose AO; Celik G; Kizilay O; Imamoglu S; Yildiz E
Beyoglu Eye J; 2023; 8(3):170-176. PubMed ID: 37766760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry.
Senthil S; Chary R; Ali MH; Choudhari N; Badakere S; Krishnamurthy R; Dikshit S; Garudadri C
Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1117-1123. PubMed ID: 31206396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study.
Achiron A; Blumenfeld O; Avizemer H; Karmona L; Leybowich G; Man V; Bartov E; Burgansky-Eliash Z
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):822-828. PubMed ID: 27871779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes.
Meyenberg A; Iliev ME; Eschmann R; Frueh BE
Cornea; 2008 Apr; 27(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 18362658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
Pache M; Wilmsmeyer S; Lautebach S; Funk J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 243(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 15756572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Disposable Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare ic100, and Tonopen XL to Standards of Care Goldmann Nondisposable Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure.
Wong B; Parikh D; Rosen L; Gorski M; Angelilli A; Shih C
J Glaucoma; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1119-1124. PubMed ID: 30134367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
