These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28858541)

  • 1. Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary?
    Felker ER; Raman SS; Margolis DJ; Lu DSK; Shaheen N; Natarajan S; Sharma D; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 28858541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer.
    Lee SJ; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W166-W172. PubMed ID: 30016148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
    Wang ZB; Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Tu J; Shen JK
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3995789. PubMed ID: 34671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
    Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
    Seo JW; Shin SJ; Taik Oh Y; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W1-W9. PubMed ID: 28418690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate.
    Purysko AS; Bittencourt LK; Bullen JA; Mostardeiro TR; Herts BR; Klein EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 28570099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Sufficiently Discovering Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Per-Lesion Radiology-Pathology Correlation Study.
    Lee MS; Moon MH; Kim YA; Sung CK; Woo H; Jeong H; Son H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 29702017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Nougaret S; Robertson N; Golia Pernicka J; Molinari N; Hötker AM; Ehdaie B; Sala E; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 28258355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
    Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
    Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
    Hosseiny M; Shakeri S; Felker ER; Lu D; Sayre J; Ahuja P; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 32755166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining clinical and MRI data to manage PI-RADS 3 lesions and reduce excessive biopsy.
    Yang S; Zhao W; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Chen T; Shen J
    Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Jun; 9(3):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 32676408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.
    Singh S; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Johnston EW; Parry T; Grey A; Dinneen E; Shaw G; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Haider A; Freeman A; Giganti F; Atkinson D; Moore CM; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
    Radiology; 2022 Dec; 305(3):623-630. PubMed ID: 35916679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
    Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When to biopsy Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) assessment category 3 lesions? Use of clinical and imaging variables to predict cancer diagnosis at targeted biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Leblond MA; Carrion I; Vesprini D; Schieda N; Klotz L
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2021 Apr; 15(4):115-121. PubMed ID: 33007183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.