376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28858541)
21. When to biopsy Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) assessment category 3 lesions? Use of clinical and imaging variables to predict cancer diagnosis at targeted biopsy.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Leblond MA; Carrion I; Vesprini D; Schieda N; Klotz L
Can Urol Assoc J; 2021 Apr; 15(4):115-121. PubMed ID: 33007183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MRI-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Predicts Gleason Score Upgrade in an Active Surveillance Cohort.
Washington SL; Baskin AS; Ameli N; Nguyen HG; Westphalen AC; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):574-578. PubMed ID: 31913068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 3T multiparametric MR imaging, PIRADSv2-based detection of index prostate cancer lesions in the transition zone and the peripheral zone using whole mount histopathology as reference standard.
Asvadi NH; Afshari Mirak S; Mohammadian Bajgiran A; Khoshnoodi P; Wibulpolprasert P; Margolis D; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3117-3124. PubMed ID: 29725743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Peripheral zone lesions of intermediary risk in multiparametric prostate MRI: Frequency and validation of the PI-RADSv2 risk stratification algorithm based on focal contrast enhancement.
Benndorf M; Waibel L; Krönig M; Jilg CA; Langer M; Krauss T
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():62-67. PubMed ID: 29362152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of clinically signifi cant prostate cancer with PIRADS v2 scores, PSA density, and ADC values in regions with and without mpMRI visible lesions.
Westphalen AC; Fazel F; Nguyen H; Cabarrus M; Hanley-Knutson K; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):713-723. PubMed ID: 31136112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA.
De Visschere P; Lumen N; Ost P; Decaestecker K; Pattyn E; Villeirs G
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 27726850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic performance and reproducibility of T2w based and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) based PI-RADSv2 lexicon descriptors for prostate MRI.
Benndorf M; Hahn F; Krönig M; Jilg CA; Krauss T; Langer M; Dovi-Akué P
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():9-15. PubMed ID: 28668436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Postoperative Biochemical Failure in Patients With PI-RADS Category 4 or 5 Prostate Cancers: Risk Stratification According to Zonal Location of an Index Lesion.
Shin N; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Oct; 215(4):913-919. PubMed ID: 32755167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Multivariable stratification of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for the risk of false-positive target biopsy: Impact on prostate biopsy decisions.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; De Martino M; Caregnato E; Cereser L; Soligo M; Rozze D; Pizzolitto S; Isola M; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110897. PubMed ID: 37300933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utilizing lesion diameter and prostate specific antigen density to decide on magnetic resonance imaging guided confirmatory biopsy of prostate imaging reporting and data system score three lesions in African American prostate cancer patients managed with active surveillance.
Alanee S; Deebajah M; Dabaja A; Peabody J; Menon M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 54(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 35138582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
