413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28858684)
1. What women want? A scoping survey on women's knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards ovarian reserve testing and egg freezing.
O'Brien Y; Martyn F; Glover LE; Wingfield MB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():71-76. PubMed ID: 28858684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons.
Daniluk JC; Koert E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2313-20. PubMed ID: 27591238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK.
Lallemant C; Vassard D; Nyboe Andersen A; Schmidt L; Macklon N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1402-1410. PubMed ID: 27638056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is employer coverage of elective egg freezing coercive?: a survey of medical students' knowledge, intentions, and attitudes towards elective egg freezing and employer coverage.
Ikhena-Abel DE; Confino R; Shah NJ; Lawson AK; Klock SC; Robins JC; Pavone ME
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 28577184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of infertility, fertility assessment, and assisted reproductive technologies in the era of oocyte freezing among female and male university students.
Meissner C; Schippert C; von Versen-Höynck F
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 27125212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding social oocyte freezing in Italy: a scoping survey on university female students' awareness and attitudes.
Tozzo P; Fassina A; Nespeca P; Spigarolo G; Caenazzo L
Life Sci Soc Policy; 2019 May; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 31049743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postponing Childbearing and Fertility Preservation in Young Professional Women.
Hurley EG; Ressler IB; Young S; Batcheller A; Thomas MA; DiPaola KB; Rios J
South Med J; 2018 Apr; 111(4):187-191. PubMed ID: 29719026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' attitudes towards using elective oocyte cryopreservation to accommodate the demands of their career.
Nasab S; Shah JS; Nurudeen K; Jooya ND; Abdallah ME; Sibai BM
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Sep; 36(9):1935-1947. PubMed ID: 31376103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of women of reproductive age towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.
Kasaven LS; Mitra A; Ostrysz P; Theodorou E; Murugesu S; Yazbek J; Bracewell-Milnes T; Ben Nagi J; Jones BP; Saso S
Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2478-2488. PubMed ID: 37816663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians.
Yu L; Peterson B; Inhorn MC; Boehm JK; Patrizio P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 26677956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying fertility? Direct-to-consumer ovarian reserve testing and the new (in)fertility pipeline.
Kyweluk MA
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jan; 245():112697. PubMed ID: 31786460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers.
Stoop D; Maes E; Polyzos NP; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Nekkebroeck J
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 25432922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women.
Santo EVE; Dieamant F; Petersen CG; Mauri AL; Vagnini LD; Renzi A; Zamara C; Oliveira JBA; Baruffi RLR; Franco JG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Jun; 21(2):101-104. PubMed ID: 28609276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing.
Milman LW; Senapati S; Sammel MD; Cameron KD; Gracia C
Fertil Steril; 2017 May; 107(5):1214-1222.e3. PubMed ID: 28476182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.
Druckenmiller S; DeVore S; Knopman JM; Noyes N
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(3-4):111-18. PubMed ID: 30230301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social Freezing: Pressing Pause on Fertility.
Varlas VN; Bors RG; Albu D; Penes ON; Nasui BA; Mehedintu C; Pop AL
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35-43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling.
Birch Petersen K; Hvidman HW; Sylvest R; Pinborg A; Larsen EC; Macklon KT; Andersen AN; Schmidt L
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2563-74. PubMed ID: 26401054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Awareness of fertility and reproductive aging in women seeking oocyte cryopreservation, reproductive aged controls, and female health care professionals: A comparative study.
Dundar Akın O; Boza A; Yakin K; Urman B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():146-150. PubMed ID: 30597339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age.
Wennberg AL; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Milsom I; Brännström M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Jan; 95(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 26399953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
