234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28859360)
1. Targeted next-generation sequencing of commonly mutated genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with long-term survival.
Visser E; Franken IA; Brosens LAA; de Leng WWJ; Strengman E; Offerhaus JA; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1-8. PubMed ID: 28859360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PIK3CA mutation is a favorable prognostic factor in esophageal cancer: molecular profile by next-generation sequencing using surgically resected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.
Yokota T; Serizawa M; Hosokawa A; Kusafuka K; Mori K; Sugiyama T; Tsubosa Y; Koh Y
BMC Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(1):826. PubMed ID: 30115035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular clonality analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma by multiregion sequencing of tumor samples.
van Nistelrooij AM; van Marion R; Koppert LB; Biermann K; Spaander MC; Tilanus HW; van Lanschot JJ; Wijnhoven BP; Dinjens WN
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):144. PubMed ID: 28376920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term survivors of pancreatic adenocarcinoma show low rates of genetic alterations in KRAS, TP53 and SMAD4.
Masetti M; Acquaviva G; Visani M; Tallini G; Fornelli A; Ragazzi M; Vasuri F; Grifoni D; Di Giacomo S; Fiorino S; Lombardi R; Tuminati D; Ravaioli M; Fabbri C; Bacchi-Reggiani ML; Pession A; Jovine E; de Biase D
Cancer Biomark; 2018 Feb; 21(2):323-334. PubMed ID: 29103024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Panel gene profiling of small bowel adenocarcinoma: Results from the NADEGE prospective cohort.
Aparicio T; Svrcek M; Henriques J; Afchain P; Lièvre A; Tougeron D; Gagniere J; Terrebonne E; Piessen G; Legoux JL; Lecaille C; Pocard M; Gornet JM; Zaanan A; Lavau-Denes S; Lecomte T; Deutsch D; Vernerey D; Puig PL
Int J Cancer; 2021 Apr; 148(7):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 33186471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Next-Generation Sequencing of Matched Primary and Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinomas Demonstrates Minimal Mutation Gain and Concordance to Colonic Adenocarcinomas.
Crumley SM; Pepper KL; Phan AT; Olsen RJ; Schwartz MR; Portier BP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jun; 140(6):529-35. PubMed ID: 26536055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of Assessing the Number of Mutated KRAS, CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4 Genes Using a Targeted Deep Sequencing Assay as a Prognostic Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer.
Hayashi H; Kohno T; Ueno H; Hiraoka N; Kondo S; Saito M; Shimada Y; Ichikawa H; Kato M; Shibata T; Morizane C; Sakamoto Y; Shimada K; Komatsu Y; Sakamoto N; Okusaka T
Pancreas; 2017 Mar; 46(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 28099251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alterations in driver genes are predictive of survival in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
McIntyre CA; Lawrence SA; Richards AL; Chou JF; Wong W; Capanu M; Berger MF; Donoghue MTA; Yu KH; Varghese AM; Kelsen DP; Park W; Balachandran VP; Kingham TP; D'Angelica MI; Drebin JA; Jarnagin WR; Iacobuzio-Donahue CA; Allen PJ; O'Reilly EM
Cancer; 2020 Sep; 126(17):3939-3949. PubMed ID: 32573775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinicopathological and genetic differences between low-grade and high-grade colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas.
Yoshioka Y; Togashi Y; Chikugo T; Kogita A; Taguri M; Terashima M; Mizukami T; Hayashi H; Sakai K; de Velasco MA; Tomida S; Fujita Y; Tokoro T; Ito A; Okuno K; Nishio K
Cancer; 2015 Dec; 121(24):4359-68. PubMed ID: 26488212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular driver alterations and their clinical relevance in cancer of unknown primary site.
Löffler H; Pfarr N; Kriegsmann M; Endris V; Hielscher T; Lohneis P; Folprecht G; Stenzinger A; Dietel M; Weichert W; Krämer A
Oncotarget; 2016 Jul; 7(28):44322-44329. PubMed ID: 27322425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneous mutational profile and prognosis conferred by TP53 mutations in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.
Zhu X; Salhab M; Tomaszewicz K; Meng X; Mathew C; Bathini V; Switzer B; Walter O; Cosar EF; Wang X; Lambert LA; Hutchinson LM
Hum Pathol; 2019 Mar; 85():260-269. PubMed ID: 30458197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Targeted sequencing reveals TP53 as a potential diagnostic biomarker in the post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer.
van Ginkel JH; de Leng WW; de Bree R; van Es RJ; Willems SM
Oncotarget; 2016 Sep; 7(38):61575-61586. PubMed ID: 27528217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Somatic mutation profiling of vulvar cancer: Exploring therapeutic targets.
Zięba S; Kowalik A; Zalewski K; Rusetska N; Goryca K; Piaścik A; Misiek M; Bakuła-Zalewska E; Kopczyński J; Kowalski K; Radziszewski J; Bidziński M; Góźdź S; Kowalewska M
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):552-561. PubMed ID: 29980281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concordance between genomic alterations assessed by next-generation sequencing in tumor tissue or circulating cell-free DNA.
Chae YK; Davis AA; Carneiro BA; Chandra S; Mohindra N; Kalyan A; Kaplan J; Matsangou M; Pai S; Costa R; Jovanovic B; Cristofanilli M; Platanias LC; Giles FJ
Oncotarget; 2016 Oct; 7(40):65364-65373. PubMed ID: 27588476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomarker TP53 divides patients with neoadjuvantly treated esophageal cancer into 2 subgroups with markedly different outcomes. A p53 Research Group study.
Kandioler D; Schoppmann SF; Zwrtek R; Kappel S; Wolf B; Mittlböck M; Kührer I; Hejna M; Pluschnig U; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Zacherl J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2280-6. PubMed ID: 25135238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combination of KRAS and SMAD4 mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues as a biomarker for pancreatic cancer.
Yokose T; Kitago M; Matsuda S; Sasaki Y; Masugi Y; Nakamura Y; Shinoda M; Yagi H; Abe Y; Oshima G; Hori S; Yusuke F; Nakano Y; Endo Y; Abe K; Tokino T; Kitagawa Y
Cancer Sci; 2020 Jun; 111(6):2174-2182. PubMed ID: 32314446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted next generation sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound acquired cytology from ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma has the potential to aid patient stratification for optimal therapy selection.
Gleeson FC; Kerr SE; Kipp BR; Voss JS; Minot DM; Tu ZJ; Henry MR; Graham RP; Vasmatzis G; Cheville JC; Lazaridis KN; Levy MJ
Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(34):54526-54536. PubMed ID: 27203738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinicopathological characterization of SMAD4-mutated intestinal adenocarcinomas: A case-control study.
Liao X; Hao Y; Zhang X; Ward S; Houldsworth J; Polydorides AD; Harpaz N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212142. PubMed ID: 30730996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of liquid biopsies for detection of emerging mutated genes in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Furuki H; Yamada T; Takahashi G; Iwai T; Koizumi M; Shinji S; Yokoyama Y; Takeda K; Taniai N; Uchida E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):975-982. PubMed ID: 29452859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic implication of EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 gene mutations in a large cohort of Japanese patients with surgically treated lung adenocarcinoma.
Kosaka T; Yatabe Y; Onozato R; Kuwano H; Mitsudomi T
J Thorac Oncol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19096302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
