These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28859871)

  • 21. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
    Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of a new length measurement technique for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to standard techniques: outcomes and patient satisfaction.
    Henry G; Houghton L; Culkin D; Otheguy J; Shabsigh R; Ohl DA
    J Sex Med; 2011 Sep; 8(9):2640-6. PubMed ID: 21679300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prostheses implantation correlates with female partner satisfaction.
    Vakalopoulos I; Kampantais S; Ioannidis S; Laskaridis L; Dimopoulos P; Toutziaris C; Koptsis M; Henry GD; Katsikas V
    J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2774-81. PubMed ID: 24034543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cylinder aneurysm of parylene-coated American Medical System (AMS) 700CX penile prosthesis.
    Kaufman JM; Weldon TE
    J Sex Med; 2008 Nov; 5(11):2713-5. PubMed ID: 18761594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating inflatable penile prosthesis malfunction and complaints.
    Thiel DD; Broderick GA; Bridges M
    Int J Impot Res; 2003 Oct; 15 Suppl 5():S155-61. PubMed ID: 14551597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient satisfaction after dual implantation of inflatable penile and artificial urinary sphincter prostheses.
    Mancini JG; Kizer WS; Jones LA; Mora RV; Morey AF
    Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):893-6. PubMed ID: 18374398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inflatable penile prosthesis: site-specific malfunction analysis.
    Garber BB
    Int J Impot Res; 2003 Feb; 15(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 12605237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CT imaging of inflatable penile prosthesis complications: a pictorial essay.
    Chou HL; Mohsen NA; Garber BB; Feldstein DC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):739-748. PubMed ID: 30173304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical Comparison of Inflatable Penile Implants: A Cadaveric Pilot Study.
    Wallen JJ; Barrera EV; Ge L; Pastuszak AW; Carrion RE; Perito PE; Hakky TS
    J Sex Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1034-1040. PubMed ID: 29960627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Penile Prosthesis Infections-A Review of Risk Factors, Prevention, and Treatment.
    Pineda M; Burnett AL
    Sex Med Rev; 2016 Oct; 4(4):389-398. PubMed ID: 27872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. GFS Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis: four-year clinical study.
    Fein RL
    Urology; 1994 Feb; 43(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8116117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coloplast titan inflatable penile prosthesis with one-touch release pump: review of 100 cases and comparison with genesis pump.
    Shaw T; Garber BB
    J Sex Med; 2011 Jan; 8(1):310-4. PubMed ID: 20946169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.
    Natali A; Olianas R; Fisch M
    J Sex Med; 2008 Jun; 5(6):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18410306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term revision rate due to infection in hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prostheses: 11-year follow-up.
    Serefoglu EC; Mandava SH; Gokce A; Chouhan JD; Wilson SK; Hellstrom WJ
    J Sex Med; 2012 Aug; 9(8):2182-6. PubMed ID: 22759917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: patient satisfaction and device reliability.
    Garber BB
    Urology; 1994 Feb; 43(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 8116118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie's disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders.
    Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1633-5. PubMed ID: 8863557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group.
    Carson CC; Mulcahy JJ; Govier FE
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):376-80. PubMed ID: 10893589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Penile prosthesis implantation for treatment of postpriapism erectile dysfunction.
    Durazi MH; Jalal AA
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 18592465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Prevention and treatment of the complications of inflatable penile prosthesis implantation].
    Zhu XW; Zhang FB; Wang HP; Jiang H; Shen YH; He QW
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2005 Apr; 11(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 15921261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of the AMS inflatable penile prosthesis in the management of erectile impotence.
    Rogers E; Murphy DM
    Ir Med J; 1997; 90(3):105-6. PubMed ID: 9183094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.