These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28861255)

  • 1. Coevolution of competing
    Hausch SJ; Fox JW; Vamosi SM
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Aug; 7(16):6540-6548. PubMed ID: 28861255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental evolution of competing bean beetle species reveals long-term reversals of short-term evolution, but no consistent character displacement.
    Hausch SJ; Vamosi SM; Fox JW
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Apr; 10(8):3727-3737. PubMed ID: 32313631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of intraspecific phenotypic variation on species coexistence.
    Hausch S; Vamosi SM; Fox JW
    Ecology; 2018 Jun; 99(6):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 29663356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does past evolutionary history under different mating regimes influence the demographic dynamics of interspecific competition?
    Kyogoku D; Kondoh M; Sota T
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Aug; 9(15):8616-8624. PubMed ID: 31410266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions.
    Kishi S; Nishida T; Tsubaki Y
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Sep; 78(5):1043-9. PubMed ID: 19457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of size-dependent competitive interactions promotes species coexistence.
    Anaya-Rojas JM; Bassar RD; Potter T; Blanchette A; Callahan S; Framstead N; Reznick D; Travis J
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2704-2717. PubMed ID: 34389988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does heterospecific seminal fluid reduce fecundity in interspecific copulation between seed beetles?
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    J Insect Physiol; 2015 Jan; 72():54-60. PubMed ID: 25497118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of between-species reproductive interference capability under different within-species mating regimes.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    Evolution; 2017 Nov; 71(11):2721-2727. PubMed ID: 28884796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraspecific and interspecific competition in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) on stored bambara groundnut, Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdcourt.
    Lale NE; Vidal S
    J Stored Prod Res; 2001 Oct; 37(4):329-338. PubMed ID: 11463395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Evolution of Competitive Ability.
    Sakarchi J; Germain RM
    Am Nat; 2023 Jan; 201(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 36524935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of female mating receptivity by male-derived extracts in two Callosobruchus species: consequences for interspecific mating.
    Yamane T; Miyatake T
    J Insect Physiol; 2010 Nov; 56(11):1565-71. PubMed ID: 20493873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of rapid evolution on species coexistence.
    Hart SP; Turcotte MM; Levine JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(6):2112-2117. PubMed ID: 30659157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25882439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence.
    Ousterhout BH; Serrano M; Bried JT; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1534-1548. PubMed ID: 31222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Species coexistence under resource competition with intraspecific and interspecific direct competition in a chemostat.
    Saito Y; Miki T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Nov; 78(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 20674582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of competition on fitness depend on the sex of both competitors.
    Iglesias-Carrasco M; Brookes S; Kruuk LEB; Head ML
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Sep; 10(18):9808-9826. PubMed ID: 33005346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community structure and the interplay between interspecific infection and competition.
    Bowers RG; Turner J
    J Theor Biol; 1997 Jul; 187(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 9236112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): traits associated with stored-product pest status.
    Tuda M; Rönn J; Buranapanichpan S; Wasano N; Arnqvist G
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Oct; 15(12):3541-51. PubMed ID: 17032256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unveiling the roles of interspecific competition and local adaptation in phenotypic differentiation of parapatric frogs.
    Huang Y; Wang X; Yang X; Jiang J; Hu J
    Curr Zool; 2020 Aug; 66(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 32617086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coexistence of three specialist aphids on common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca.
    Smith RA; Mooney KA; Agrawal AA
    Ecology; 2008 Aug; 89(8):2187-96. PubMed ID: 18724729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.