345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28861637)
21. Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Donaldson AR; Shetty S; Wang Z; Rivera CL; Portier BP; Budd GT; Downs-Kelly E; Lanigan CP; Calhoun BC
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2230-2239. PubMed ID: 28192599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.
Crespo J; Sun H; Wu J; Ding QQ; Tang G; Robinson MK; Chen H; Sahin AA; Lim B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241775. PubMed ID: 33180796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor.
Liu Y; Wu S; Shi X; Luo Y; Pang J; Wang C; Mao F; Liang Z; Zeng X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Nov; 178(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 31388934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.
Pu X; Shi J; Li Z; Feng A; Ye Q
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Jun; 211(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 25818873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.
Taylor VJ; Barnes PJ; Godwin SC; Bethune GC
Virchows Arch; 2021 Jul; 479(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33527151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancers categorized as HER2-positive using an alternative chromosome 17 probe assay.
Desai NV; Torous V; Parker J; Auman JT; Rosson GB; Cruz C; Perou CM; Schnitt SJ; Tung N
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jul; 20(1):75. PubMed ID: 29996866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Focused Update.
Gordian-Arroyo AM; Zynger DL; Tozbikian GH
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun; 152(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 30958889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. FISH and HER2/
Patil Okaly GV; Panwar D; Lingappa KB; Kumari P; Anand A; Kumar P; Chikkalingaiah MH; Kumar RV
Indian J Cancer; 2019; 56(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 31062729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Solomon JP; Dell'Aquila M; Fadare O; Hasteh F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Apr; 147(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28340220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical role of HER2 gene amplification and chromosome 17: a study on 154 IHC-equivocal cases of invasive breast carcinoma patients.
Afzal M; Amir M; Hassan MJ; Hussain MS; Aziz MN; Murad S; Murtaza I; Anees M; Sultan A
Tumour Biol; 2016 Jul; 37(7):8665-72. PubMed ID: 26738861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX.
Tozbikian GH; Zynger DL
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 29498449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Assessment and significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene status in breast cancer with polysomy of chromosome 17].
Zhang H; Si JW; Zhang S; Wang Y; Li D; Li T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 38(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 26899332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utility of Alternate, Noncentromeric Chromosome 17 Reference Probe for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing in Breast Cancer Cases.
Pai T; Shet T; Patil A; Shetty O; Singh A; Desai SB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 May; 142(5):626-633. PubMed ID: 29384691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
McLemore LE; Albarracin CT; Gruschkus SK; Bassett RL; Wu Y; Dhamne S; Yim I; Lin K; Bedrosian I; Sneige N; Chen H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33813685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic significance of equivocal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results and clinical utility of alternative chromosome 17 genes in patients with invasive breast cancer: A cohort study.
Sneige N; Hess KR; Multani AS; Gong Y; Ibrahim NK
Cancer; 2017 Apr; 123(7):1115-1123. PubMed ID: 27893937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
