These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28861904)

  • 21. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.
    Guerrero AM; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 27601156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Building robust conservation plans.
    Visconti P; Joppa L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conservation lessons from taboos and trolley problems.
    Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):794-803. PubMed ID: 32851689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans.
    Nel JL; Roux DJ; Driver A; Hill L; Maherry AC; Snaddon K; Petersen CR; Smith-Adao LB; Van Deventer H; Reyers B
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):176-88. PubMed ID: 26041340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Balancing emotion and cognition: a case for decision aiding in conservation efforts.
    Wilson RS
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1452-60. PubMed ID: 18717697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity.
    Cook CN; Wintle BC; Aldrich SC; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1474-83. PubMed ID: 25381735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions.
    Cook CN; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):902-15. PubMed ID: 24001025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implicit decision framing as an unrecognized source of confusion in endangered species classification.
    Cummings JW; Converse SJ; Smith DR; Morey S; Runge MC
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1246-1254. PubMed ID: 29987850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings.
    Buchs A; Hassenforder E; Meinard Y
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):804-815. PubMed ID: 33044786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
    Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management.
    Groce JE; Farrelly MA; Jorgensen BS; Cook CN
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29738621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application of decision tools to ethical analysis in biodiversity conservation.
    Biasetti P; Hildebrandt TB; Göritz F; Hermes R; Holtze S; Stejskal J; Galli C; Pollastri I; Muzzo A; Lekolool I; Ndereeh D; Omondi P; Kariuki L; Mijele D; Mutisya S; Ngulu S; de Mori B
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14029. PubMed ID: 36317722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A classification framework for interspecific trade-offs in aquatic ecology.
    Smyth ERB; Drake DAR
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13762. PubMed ID: 34057237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of monitoring data to support conservation management and policy decisions in Micronesia.
    Montambault JR; Wongbusarakum S; Leberer T; Joseph E; Andrew W; Castro F; Nevitt B; Golbuu Y; Oldiais NW; Groves CR; Kostka W; Houk P
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1279-89. PubMed ID: 26036983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Applying a values-based decision process to facilitate comanagement of threatened species in Aotearoa New Zealand.
    McMurdo Hamilton T; Canessa S; Clark K; Gleeson P; Mackenzie F; Makan T; Moses-Te Kani G; Oliver S; Parker KA; Ewen JG
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1162-1173. PubMed ID: 33034391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.
    Zabala A; Sandbrook C; Mukherjee N
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1185-1194. PubMed ID: 29707822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficiency and equity in land conservation: the effects of policy scale.
    Ay JS; Napoléone C
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():190-8. PubMed ID: 23939138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A web-based multicriteria evaluation of spatial trade-offs between environmental and economic implications from hydraulic fracturing in a shale gas region in Ohio.
    Liu X; Gorsevski PV; Yacobucci MM; Onasch CM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jun; 188(6):376. PubMed ID: 27230428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.