BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28862573)

  • 1. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the sagittal spinal profile type on the long-term outcome of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis after microsurgical decompression.
    Früh A; Sargut TA; Prinz V; Hecht N; Franke J; Dinkelbach M; Pöhlmann F; Vajkoczy P; Bayerl S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Jun; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38848599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.
    Li J; Zhang D; Shen Y; Qi X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):326. PubMed ID: 32795374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.
    Scheer JK; Passias PG; Sorocean AM; Boniello AJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Kim HJ; Protopsaltis TS; Gupta M; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Lafage V; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 26360147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of spinopelvic morphology on the short-term outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 104 patients.
    Eskilsson K; Sharma D; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 28452632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Park P; Fu KM; Mummaneni PV; Uribe JS; Wang MY; Tran S; Kanter AS; Nunley PD; Okonkwo DO; Shaffrey CI; Mundis GM; Chou D; Eastlack R; Anand N; Than KD; Zavatsky JM; Fessler RG;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):560-564. PubMed ID: 30095383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of sagittal imbalance correction on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF for LSS.
    Jia J; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 181():119-126. PubMed ID: 31039493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between clinical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in osteoporosis.
    Lee JS; Shin JK; An SJ; Suh KT; Kang SS
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Dec; 80(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 26280725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
    Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.
    Fujii K; Kawamura N; Ikegami M; Niitsuma G; Kunogi J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):703-9. PubMed ID: 25394314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association Between Radiographic Spinopelvic Parameters and Health-related Quality of Life in De Novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Concomitant Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Gao A; Wang Y; Yu M; Wei F; Jiang L; Liu Z; Liu X
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(16):E1013-E1019. PubMed ID: 32118697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 60.