These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28862689)

  • 1. The Efficacy of Electron Beam Irradiated Bacterial Cellulose Membranes as Compared with Collagen Membranes on Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-Implant Bone Defects.
    Lee SH; An SJ; Lim YM; Huh JB
    Materials (Basel); 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28862689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparation and Characterization of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Treated by Electron Beam Irradiation for Guided Bone Regeneration.
    An SJ; Lee SH; Huh JB; Jeong SI; Park JS; Gwon HJ; Kang ES; Jeong CM; Lim YM
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Oct; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 29068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration.
    Lee SH; Lim YM; Jeong SI; An SJ; Kang SS; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 7(6):484-95. PubMed ID: 26816579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects.
    Oh TJ; Meraw SJ; Lee EJ; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 12562369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of 3D printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP versus collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in a beagle implant model.
    Won JY; Park CY; Bae JH; Ahn G; Kim C; Lim DH; Cho DW; Yun WS; Shim JH; Huh JB
    Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 11(5):055013. PubMed ID: 27716630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs.
    Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Herten M; Wüstefeld M; Sager M; Ferrari D; Becker J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 18324961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants using a resorbable membrane vs a PTFE membrane.
    Schliephake H; Dard M; Planck H; Hierlemann H; Jakob A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Jun; 11(3):230-41. PubMed ID: 11168214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination.
    Mir-Mari J; Wui H; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 25856209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes: 6-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Benic GI; Eisner BM; Jung RE; Basler T; Schneider D; Hämmerle CHF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 31332835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Lee SH; Yoon HJ; Park MK; Kim YS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 19216278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osteogenic efficacy of BMP-2 mixed with hydrogel and bone substitute in peri-implant dehiscence defects in dogs: 16 weeks of healing.
    Cha JK; Jung UW; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):300-308. PubMed ID: 29341335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resorbable bacterial cellulose membranes with strontium release for guided bone regeneration.
    Luz EPCG; das Chagas BS; de Almeida NT; de Fátima Borges M; Andrade FK; Muniz CR; Castro-Silva II; Teixeira EH; Popat K; de Freitas Rosa M; Vieira RS
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Nov; 116():111175. PubMed ID: 32806235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guided bone regeneration at zirconia and titanium dental implants: a pilot histological investigation.
    Benic GI; Thoma DS; Sanz-Martin I; Munoz F; Hämmerle CHF; Cantalapiedra A; Fischer J; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 28653343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
    Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Stability of Augmented Bone Between Two Different Membranes Used for Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous with Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone.
    Arunjaroensuk S; Panmekiate S; Pimkhaokham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):206–216. PubMed ID: 29028848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of using PDGF and xenograft with or without collagen membrane for bone regeneration around immediate implants with induced dehiscence-type defects: a microcomputed tomographic study in dogs.
    Al-Hazmi BA; Al-Hamdan KS; Al-Rasheed A; Babay N; Wang HL; Al-Hezaimi K
    J Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 22524331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques.
    Thoma DS; Jung UW; Park JY; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e76-e83. PubMed ID: 27206342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone regeneration around implants in the canine mandible with cultured fibroblasts in polyglactin mesh.
    Sparks MS; Kerns DG; Wilson TG; Hallmon WW; Spears R; Haghighat N
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jul; 78(7):1276-87. PubMed ID: 17608583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.