1134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863138)
1. 5C analysis of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex locus reveals distinct chromatin interaction networks between gene-rich and gene-poor TADs in skin epithelial cells.
Poterlowicz K; Yarker JL; Malashchuk I; Lajoie BR; Mardaryev AN; Gdula MR; Sharov AA; Kohwi-Shigematsu T; Botchkarev VA; Fessing MY
PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006966. PubMed ID: 28863138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. p63 and Brg1 control developmentally regulated higher-order chromatin remodelling at the epidermal differentiation complex locus in epidermal progenitor cells.
Mardaryev AN; Gdula MR; Yarker JL; Emelianov VU; Poterlowicz K; Sharov AA; Sharova TY; Scarpa JA; Joffe B; Solovei I; Chambon P; Botchkarev VA; Fessing MY
Development; 2014 Jan; 141(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 24346698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of 3D genome organization, guided by cohesin and CTCF looping, on sex-biased chromatin interactions and gene expression in mouse liver.
Matthews BJ; Waxman DJ
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2020 Jul; 13(1):30. PubMed ID: 32680543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple CTCF sites cooperate with each other to maintain a TAD for enhancer-promoter interaction in the β-globin locus.
Kang J; Kim YW; Park S; Kang Y; Kim A
FASEB J; 2021 Aug; 35(8):e21768. PubMed ID: 34245617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving the 3D Landscape of Transcription-Linked Mammalian Chromatin Folding.
Hsieh TS; Cattoglio C; Slobodyanyuk E; Hansen AS; Rando OJ; Tjian R; Darzacq X
Mol Cell; 2020 May; 78(3):539-553.e8. PubMed ID: 32213323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the Interaction between the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complex and the Zinc Finger Factor CTCF.
Valletta M; Russo R; Baglivo I; Russo V; Ragucci S; Sandomenico A; Iaccarino E; Ruvo M; De Feis I; Angelini C; Iachettini S; Biroccio A; Pedone PV; Chambery A
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Nov; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 33255744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue-specific CTCF-cohesin-mediated chromatin architecture delimits enhancer interactions and function in vivo.
Hanssen LLP; Kassouf MT; Oudelaar AM; Biggs D; Preece C; Downes DJ; Gosden M; Sharpe JA; Sloane-Stanley JA; Hughes JR; Davies B; Higgs DR
Nat Cell Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(8):952-961. PubMed ID: 28737770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invariant TAD Boundaries Constrain Cell-Type-Specific Looping Interactions between Promoters and Distal Elements around the CFTR Locus.
Smith EM; Lajoie BR; Jain G; Dekker J
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 98(1):185-201. PubMed ID: 26748519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling genome-wide topological associating domains in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Zhan Y; Giorgetti L; Tiana G
Chromosome Res; 2017 Mar; 25(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 28108933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of transposable elements and distal enhancers to evolution of human-specific features of interphase chromatin architecture in embryonic stem cells.
Glinsky GV
Chromosome Res; 2018 Mar; 26(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 29335803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CTCF fences make good neighbours.
Krivega I; Dean A
Nat Cell Biol; 2017 Jul; 19(8):883-885. PubMed ID: 28752854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromatin topology and the timing of enhancer function at the
Rodríguez-Carballo E; Lopez-Delisle L; Willemin A; Beccari L; Gitto S; Mascrez B; Duboule D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(49):31231-31241. PubMed ID: 33229569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolutionary comparison reveals that diverging CTCF sites are signatures of ancestral topological associating domains borders.
Gómez-Marín C; Tena JJ; Acemel RD; López-Mayorga M; Naranjo S; de la Calle-Mustienes E; Maeso I; Beccari L; Aneas I; Vielmas E; Bovolenta P; Nobrega MA; Carvajal J; Gómez-Skarmeta JL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7542-7. PubMed ID: 26034287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Topologically Associating Domains: An invariant framework or a dynamic scaffold?
Cubeñas-Potts C; Corces VG
Nucleus; 2015; 6(6):430-4. PubMed ID: 26418477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GRHL3 binding and enhancers rearrange as epidermal keratinocytes transition between functional states.
Klein RH; Lin Z; Hopkin AS; Gordon W; Tsoi LC; Liang Y; Gudjonsson JE; Andersen B
PLoS Genet; 2017 Apr; 13(4):e1006745. PubMed ID: 28445475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.
Torosin NS; Anand A; Golla TR; Cao W; Ellison CE
PLoS Genet; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1009229. PubMed ID: 33284803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional dissection of the Sox9-Kcnj2 locus identifies nonessential and instructive roles of TAD architecture.
Despang A; Schöpflin R; Franke M; Ali S; Jerković I; Paliou C; Chan WL; Timmermann B; Wittler L; Vingron M; Mundlos S; Ibrahim DM
Nat Genet; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 31358994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active enhancers strengthen insulation by RNA-mediated CTCF binding at chromatin domain boundaries.
Islam Z; Saravanan B; Walavalkar K; Farooq U; Singh AK; Radhakrishnan S; Thakur J; Pandit A; Henikoff S; Notani D
Genome Res; 2023 Jan; 33(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 36650052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development.
Bonev B; Mendelson Cohen N; Szabo Q; Fritsch L; Papadopoulos GL; Lubling Y; Xu X; Lv X; Hugnot JP; Tanay A; Cavalli G
Cell; 2017 Oct; 171(3):557-572.e24. PubMed ID: 29053968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture.
Cubeñas-Potts C; Rowley MJ; Lyu X; Li G; Lei EP; Corces VG
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1714-1730. PubMed ID: 27899590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
