These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863599)

  • 21. Acoustic and EGG analyses of emotional utterances.
    Waaramaa T; Kankare E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Apr; 38(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22587654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vocal Performance of Group Fitness Instructors Before and After Instruction: Changes in Acoustic Measures and Self-Ratings.
    Dallaston K; Rumbach AF
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25795364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When "okay" is not okay: acoustic characteristics of single-word prosody conveying reluctance.
    van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL13-9. PubMed ID: 23298012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Compensatory responses to loudness-shifted voice feedback during production of Mandarin speech.
    Liu H; Zhang Q; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2405-12. PubMed ID: 17902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flow Glottogram Characteristics and Perceived Degree of Phonatory Pressedness.
    Millgård M; Fors T; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 26001499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vocal flexibility and prosodic strategies in a professional impersonator.
    Revis J; De Looze C; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e23-31. PubMed ID: 23453593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of extended voice use on the acoustic characteristics of phonation after training and performance of actors from the La MaMa Experimental Theater club.
    Ferrone C; Galgano J; Ramig LO
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):e123-37. PubMed ID: 20381306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
    Kopf LM; Jackson-Menaldi C; Rubin AD; Skeffington J; Hunter EJ; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vocal Quality in Theater Actors.
    D'haeseleer E; Meerschman I; Claeys S; Leyns C; Daelman J; Van Lierde K
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):510.e7-510.e14. PubMed ID: 27979333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the accuracy of adults' auditory perception of normophonic and dysphonic children's personality.
    Verduyckt I; Remacle M; Morsomme D
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Oct; 40(3):136-47. PubMed ID: 24861104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic analyses support subjective judgments of vocal emotion.
    Monnot M; Orbelo D; Riccardo L; Sikka S; Rossa E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Dec; 1000():288-92. PubMed ID: 14766639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What Do We Hear in the Voice? An Open-Ended Judgment Study of Emotional Speech Prosody.
    Elfenbein HA; Laukka P; Althoff J; Chui W; Iraki FK; Rockstuhl T; Thingujam NS
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1087-1104. PubMed ID: 34296644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Self-perceived and Acoustic Voice Characteristics of Russian-English Bilinguals.
    Ryabov R; Malakh M; Trachtenberg M; Wohl S; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):772.e1-772.e8. PubMed ID: 26774848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual Error Identification of Human and Synthesized Voices.
    Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):639.e17-23. PubMed ID: 26337775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Voice Performance Chart: A Pedagogical Tool to Enhance Vocal Expressive Ability in Acting Students.
    Fernandez-Fresard G; Acevedo K
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):797.e1-797.e10. PubMed ID: 34895988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.