318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863884)
1. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers?
Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.
D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
Kiatkroekkrai P; Takolpuckdee C; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of virtually planned and 3D-printed stereolithographic surgical guides from CBCT and digital scans: An in vitro study.
Shah NP; Khanna A; Pai AR; Sheth VH; Raut SR
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 33583616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.
Farley NE; Kennedy K; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 23527361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
