338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863911)
1. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.
Cochrane NJ; Lo TWG; Adams GG; Schneider PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 28863911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
Yamada R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12518948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bonding and debonding with a light-activated resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
Fricker JP
Aust Orthod J; 1996 Mar; 14(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 9063113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface appearance following the use of glass ionomer cement and a diacrylate resin for bracket bonding.
Ostman-Andersson E; Marcusson A; Hörstedt P
Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 8236031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
Pascotto RC; Navarro MF; Capelozza Filho L; Cury JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14718877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics.
Wiltshire WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 8059747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
Amditis C
Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement.
Martin S; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 7977207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel.
Eliades T; Viazis AD; Lekka M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8322720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
