127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863916)
1. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.
Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography.
Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X
Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.
Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):895-899. PubMed ID: 29381618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study.
Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construction and validity of a midsagittal plane based on the symmetry of a 3-dimensional model of the relevant cranial base.
Feng B; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Yu M; Wang H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 33357762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.
Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary Study to Determine the Reference Plane of Patients With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
Kim NR; Park SB; Shin SM; Choi YS; Kim SS; Son WS; Kim YI
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Nov; 54(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 27537492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
