127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863916)
21. Quantitation of zygomatic complex symmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Gong X; He Y; He Y; An JG; Yang Y; Zhang Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):2053.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25234538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of different setups of the Frankfort horizontal plane on 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements.
Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Aug; 152(2):242-249. PubMed ID: 28760286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variability of the inclination of anatomic horizontal reference planes of the craniofacial complex in relation to the true horizontal line in orthognathic patients.
Zebeib AM; Naini FB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 25432255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of a Novel Semi-Automatic Technique for Determining the Bilateral Symmetry Plane of the Facial Skeleton of Normal Adult Males.
Roumeliotis G; Willing R; Neuert M; Ahluwalia R; Jenkyn T; Yazdani A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1997-2001. PubMed ID: 26355983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Evaluation of three methods for constructing craniofacial mid-sagittal plane based on the cone beam computed tomography].
Wang SW; Li M; Yang HF; Zhao YJ; Wang Y; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Apr; 48(2):330-5. PubMed ID: 27080291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Point-to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible.
Bettschart C; Kruse A; Matthews F; Zemann W; Obwegeser JA; Grätz KW; Lübbers HT
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 22079336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of different midsagittal plane configurations for evaluating craniofacial asymmetry by expert preference.
An S; Lee JY; Chung CJ; Kim KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Dec; 152(6):788-797. PubMed ID: 29173858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Using three-dimensional craniofacial images to construct horizontal reference plane].
Kim MJ; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Oct; 51(5):937-943. PubMed ID: 31624402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
Ruellas AC; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Gomes MR; Danesi C; Lione R; Nguyen T; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of three midsagittal planes for three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation.
Lee EH; Yu HS; Lee KJ; Han SS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ
Korean J Orthod; 2020 Jan; 50(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 32042715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anatomical location of cephalometric landmarks on the sphenoid and temporal bones.
Savara BS; Takeuchi Y
Angle Orthod; 1979 Apr; 49(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 286567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study.
Di Carlo G; Polimeni A; Melsen B; Cattaneo PM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25237711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
