332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863943)
1. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.
Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY
Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Gender on Visual Field Sensitivity: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):183-188. PubMed ID: 30672362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.
Rabiolo A; Morales E; Kim JH; Afifi AA; Yu F; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2020 Jun; 127(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 31952885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change.
Meira-Freitas D; Tatham AJ; Lisboa R; Kuang TM; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Medeiros FA
Ophthalmology; 2014 Feb; 121(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 24289917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Usefulness of Gaze Tracking as an Index of Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6233-6. PubMed ID: 26431476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients.
Raman P; Khy Ching Y; Sivagurunathan PD; Ramli N; Mohd Khalid KH
J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices.
Asaoka R; Fujino Y; Aoki S; Matsuura M; Murata H
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 32672604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Perimetry and Visual Dysfunction in Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury.
Lemke S; Cockerham GC; Glynn-Milley C; Lin R; Cockerham KP
Ophthalmology; 2016 Feb; 123(2):415-424. PubMed ID: 26581554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
Goukon H; Hirasawa K; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pattern of Visual Field Loss in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Across Different Severity Levels.
Atalay E; Nongpiur ME; Yap SC; Wong TT; Goh D; Husain R; Perera SA; Aung T
Ophthalmology; 2016 Sep; 123(9):1957-64. PubMed ID: 27423311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
