333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863943)
21. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frontloading SITA-Faster Can Increase Frequency and Reliability of Visual Field Testing at Minimal Time Cost.
Tan JCK; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):445-456. PubMed ID: 36958625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors Predicting a Greater Likelihood of Poor Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects.
Aboobakar IF; Wang J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY; Yohannan J
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 32509439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography.
Ajtony C; Balla Z; Somoskeoy S; Kovacs B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 17197541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
Su D; Greenberg A; Simonson JL; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 26783097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Misleading statistical calculations in far-advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
Blumenthal EZ; Sapir-Pichhadze R
Ophthalmology; 2003 Jan; 110(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 12511366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of pseudophakia on standard perimetry parameters.
Mutlu FM; Akay F; Bayer A
Curr Eye Res; 2009 Sep; 34(9):711-6. PubMed ID: 19839864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability.
Arora KS; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Jefferys JL; West SK; Ramulu PY
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2476-2484. PubMed ID: 23993358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Tanna AP; Abraham C; Lai J; Shen J
Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1504-7. PubMed ID: 15288979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Baseline Age and Mean Deviation Affect the Rate of Glaucomatous Vision Loss.
Bommakanti N; De Moraes CG; Boland MV; Myers JS; Wellik SR; Elze T; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jan; 29(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 31688371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Real-World Analysis of the Aging Effects on Visual Field Reliability Indices in Humans.
Shirakami T; Omura T; Fukuda H; Asaoka R; Tanito M
J Clin Med; 2021 Dec; 10(24):. PubMed ID: 34945071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Visual field progression in glaucoma: what is the specificity of the Guided Progression Analysis?
Artes PH; O'Leary N; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC; Crabb DP
Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct; 121(10):2023-7. PubMed ID: 24878173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
