BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863987)

  • 1. [Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature. A problem analysis].
    Mertz M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Nov; 127-128():11-20. PubMed ID: 28863987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).
    Mertz M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):81. PubMed ID: 31727134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews.
    Mertz M; Kahrass H; Strech D
    BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 27716264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews.
    Mertz M; Strech D; Kahrass H
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):261. PubMed ID: 29258598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.
    Mertz M; Nobile H; Kahrass H
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 Jun; 27(4):960-978. PubMed ID: 32238039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value.
    McDougall R
    J Med Philos; 2014 Feb; 39(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 24334289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
    Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Argument-based medical ethics: a formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature.
    McCullough LB; Coverdale JH; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1097-102. PubMed ID: 15507927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [SR/PS-method for using data of primary studies from systematic reviews in the evaluation of health technologies].
    Gorenoi V; Hagen A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(5-6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25066352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.