These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28863987)

  • 21. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence-based ethics--what it should be and what it shouldn't.
    Strech D
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18937838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Empirical population and public health ethics: A review and critical analysis to advance robust empirical-normative inquiry.
    Knight R
    Health (London); 2016 May; 20(3):274-90. PubMed ID: 25956917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
    Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].
    Davoli M; Amato L; Minozzi S; Bargagli AM; Vecchi S; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2005; 29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. PubMed ID: 16529350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics.
    Salloch S; Vollmann J; Schildmann J
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):597-602. PubMed ID: 23632008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.
    Young I; Waddell L; Sanchez J; Wilhelm B; McEwen SA; Rajić A
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Mar; 113(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24485274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A review of quality assessment of the methodology used in guidelines and systematic reviews on oral mucositis.
    Potting C; Mistiaen P; Poot E; Blijlevens N; Donnelly P; van Achterberg T
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jan; 18(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 19120727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence Review Group approaches to the critical appraisal of manufacturer submissions for the NICE STA process: a mapping study and thematic analysis.
    Kaltenthaler E; Boland A; Carroll C; Dickson R; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(22):1-82, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21561569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].
    Schnabel A; Kranke P
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2010 Jul; 45(7-8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20665362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
    Strech D
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality appraisal of spatial epidemiology and health geography research: A scoping review of systematic reviews.
    Wood SM; Alston L; Beks H; Mc Namara K; Coffee NT; Clark RA; Wong Shee A; Versace VL
    Health Place; 2023 Sep; 83():103108. PubMed ID: 37651961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.
    Mertz M; Schildmann J
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 28733796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.