These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28865878)

  • 1. Will Perimetry Be Performed to Monitor Glaucoma in 2025?
    Camp AS; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Dec; 124(12S):S71-S75. PubMed ID: 28865878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls.
    Redmond T; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry provides additional information to static automated perimetry in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
    Nowomiejska K; Wrobel-Dudzinska D; Ksiazek K; Ksiazek P; Rejdak K; Maciejewski R; Juenemann AG; Rejdak R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25444538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma?
    Anderson AJ; Bedggood PA; George Kong YX; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Dec; 124(12):1735-1742. PubMed ID: 28764889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.
    Horn FK; Scharch V; Mardin CY; Lämmer R; Kremers J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 26883356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
    Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-wavelength automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous standard visual field loss by ten years.
    Sit AJ; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2004; 19(3-4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15590553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency of Testing to Detect Visual Field Progression Derived Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Glaucoma Patients.
    Wu Z; Saunders LJ; Daga FB; Diniz-Filho A; Medeiros FA
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Jun; 124(6):786-792. PubMed ID: 28268099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression.
    Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent developments in visual field testing for glaucoma.
    Wu Z; Medeiros FA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 29(2):141-146. PubMed ID: 29256895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of visual field testing frequency on detection of glaucoma progression with trend analyses.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K; Zarei R; Caprioli J
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 129(12):1521-7. PubMed ID: 21825177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.