739 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28866972)
1. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients.
Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS
Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods].
Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of Continuous-wave Doppler Ultrasound Monitor and Echocardiography in Cardiac Postoperative Pediatric Patients.
Shostak E; Nahum E; Shochat T; Manor O; Dagan O; Schiller O
J Intensive Care Med; 2022 Dec; 37(12):1634-1640. PubMed ID: 35503529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.
Nguyen HB; Banta DP; Stewart G; Kim T; Bansal R; Anholm J; Wittlake WA; Corbett SW
J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Jun; 24(3):237-47. PubMed ID: 20563629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive cardiac output assessment in critically ill paediatric patients.
Wongsirimetheekul T; Khositseth A; Lertbunrian R
Acta Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 69(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24783468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of systemic oxygen delivery and inotropy in healthy term neonates with the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM).
He SR; Sun X; Zhang C; Jian Z; Sun YX; Zheng ML; Liu YM; Madigan VM; Smith BE
Early Hum Dev; 2013 May; 89(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 23164929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive method for rapid bedside estimation of inotropy: theory and preliminary clinical validation.
Smith BE; Madigan VM
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 23645929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in critically ill patients: comparison of CW-Doppler ultrasound cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) and thermodilution (PiCCO).
Horster S; Stemmler HJ; Sparrer J; Tischer J; Hausmann A; Geiger S
Acta Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 67(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 22641975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.
McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.
Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults.
Zhang J; Critchley LA; Lee DC; Khaw KS; Lee SW
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 26873749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates.
Meyer S; Todd D; Shadboldt B
J Paediatr Child Health; 2009; 45(7-8):464-8. PubMed ID: 19712182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery.
Cheng YW; Xu F; Li J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12289. PubMed ID: 30278500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical observation of passive leg raising combined with non invasive cardiac output monitoring system in predicting volume responsiveness].
Wang HL; Liu HT; Yu KJ
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2011 Mar; 23(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 21366942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac Output Measurement Using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor: A Validation Study in Newborn Infants.
Fraga MV; Dysart KC; Rintoul N; Chaudhary AS; Ratcliffe SJ; Fedec A; Kren S; Cohen MS; Kirpalani H
Neonatology; 2019; 116(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31326967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring methods in critically ill children.
Chaiyakulsil C; Chantra M; Katanyuwong P; Khositseth A; Anantasit N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199203. PubMed ID: 29912937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
