BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28867959)

  • 1. Structural features and seismotectonic implications of coseismic surface ruptures produced by the 2016
    Lin A
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(5):1079-1100. PubMed ID: 28867959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RETRACTED: Coseismic rupturing stopped by Aso volcano during the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan.
    Lin A; Satsukawa T; Wang M; Mohammadi Asl Z; Fueta R; Nakajima F
    Science; 2016 Nov; 354(6314):869-874. PubMed ID: 27856904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recurrent large earthquakes related with an active fault-volcano system, southwest Japan.
    Lin A; Chen P; Sado K
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14081. PubMed ID: 30237534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research on the Surface Deformation, Fault Rupture, and Coseismic Geohazard of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.8 Earthquake.
    Lu Y; Yang Y; Zeng L; Xu W; Song J; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'Conjugate' coseismic surface faulting related with the 29 December 2020, Mw 6.4, Petrinja earthquake (Sisak-Moslavina, Croatia).
    Tondi E; Blumetti AM; Čičak M; Di Manna P; Galli P; Invernizzi C; Mazzoli S; Piccardi L; Valentini G; Vittori E; Volatili T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9150. PubMed ID: 33911085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran.
    Fielding EJ; Lundgren PR; Bürgmann R; Funning GJ
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):64-8. PubMed ID: 19262670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence.
    Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paleoseismic study of the Kamishiro Fault on the northern segment of the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line, Japan.
    Lin A; Sano M; Wang M; Yan B; Bian D; Fueta R; Hosoya T
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(4):683-703. PubMed ID: 28729808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immature characteristics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone from SAR, GNSS and strong motion data of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake doublet.
    Liu J; Huang C; Zhang G; Shan X; Korzhenkov A; Taymaz T
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10625. PubMed ID: 38724632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-resolution co-seismic fault offsets of the 2023 Türkiye earthquake ruptures using satellite imagery.
    Provost F; Karabacak V; Malet JP; Van der Woerd J; Meghraoui M; Masson F; Ferry M; Michéa D; Pointal E
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6834. PubMed ID: 38514658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship of preseismic, coseismic, and postseismic fault ruptures of two large interplate aftershocks of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake with slow-earthquake activity.
    Kubo H; Nishikawa T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12044. PubMed ID: 32694554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial and temporal seismic velocity changes on Kyushu Island during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake.
    Nimiya H; Ikeda T; Tsuji T
    Sci Adv; 2017 Nov; 3(11):e1700813. PubMed ID: 29202026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Triple junction kinematics accounts for the 2016 M
    Shi X; Tapponnier P; Wang T; Wei S; Wang Y; Wang X; Jiao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(52):26367-26375. PubMed ID: 31822611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations.
    Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coseismic Deformation Field and Fault Slip Distribution Inversion of the 2020 Jiashi
    Zhang X; Li J; Liu X; Li Z; Adil N
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. En échelon and orthogonal fault ruptures of the 11 April 2012 great intraplate earthquakes.
    Yue H; Lay T; Koper KD
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):245-9. PubMed ID: 23023129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cascading and pulse-like ruptures during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone.
    Chen K; Avouac JP; Aati S; Milliner C; Zheng F; Shi C
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jan; 11(1):22. PubMed ID: 31911581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface ruptures database related to the 26 December 2018, M
    Villani F; Pucci S; Azzaro R; Civico R; Cinti FR; Pizzimenti L; Tarabusi G; Branca S; Brunori CA; Caciagli M; Cantarero M; Cucci L; D'Amico S; De Beni E; De Martini PM; Mariucci MT; Messina A; Montone P; Nappi R; Nave R; Pantosti D; Ricci T; Sapia V; Smedile A; Vallone R; Venuti A
    Sci Data; 2020 Feb; 7(1):42. PubMed ID: 32034156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model.
    Duan H; Chen J; Zhang S; Wu X; Chu Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3514. PubMed ID: 35241753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coseismic and Postseismic Fault Slip for the 17 August 1999, M = 7.5, Izmit, Turkey Earthquake.
    Reilinger RE; Ergintav S; Bürgmann R; McClusky S; Lenk O; Barka A; Gurkan O; Hearn L; Feigl KL; Cakmak R; Aktug B; Ozener H; Töksoz MN
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5484):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 10968782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.