474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28868132)
1. Comprehensive comparison of Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies and their applications to transcriptome analysis.
Weirather JL; de Cesare M; Wang Y; Piazza P; Sebastiano V; Wang XJ; Buck D; Au KF
F1000Res; 2017; 6():100. PubMed ID: 28868132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis and comprehensive comparison of PacBio and nanopore-based RNA sequencing of the
Cui J; Shen N; Lu Z; Xu G; Wang Y; Jin B
Plant Methods; 2020; 16():85. PubMed ID: 32536962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Analysis of PacBio and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technologies for Transcriptomic Landscape Identification of
Udaondo Z; Sittikankaew K; Uengwetwanit T; Wongsurawat T; Sonthirod C; Jenjaroenpun P; Pootakham W; Karoonuthaisiri N; Nookaew I
Life (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34440606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the two up-to-date sequencing technologies for genome assembly: HiFi reads of Pacific Biosciences Sequel II system and ultralong reads of Oxford Nanopore.
Lang D; Zhang S; Ren P; Liang F; Sun Z; Meng G; Tan Y; Li X; Lai Q; Han L; Wang D; Hu F; Wang W; Liu S
Gigascience; 2020 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33319909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of PacBio and ONT RNA sequencing methods for Nemopilema Nomurai venom identification.
Ma Y; Li J; Yu H; Teng L; Geng H; Li R; Xing R; Liu S; Li P
Genomics; 2023 Nov; 115(6):110709. PubMed ID: 37739021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcript Profiling Using Long-Read Sequencing Technologies.
Bayega A; Wang YC; Oikonomopoulos S; Djambazian H; Fahiminiya S; Ragoussis J
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1783():121-147. PubMed ID: 29767360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PBSIM3: a simulator for all types of PacBio and ONT long reads.
Ono Y; Hamada M; Asai K
NAR Genom Bioinform; 2022 Dec; 4(4):lqac092. PubMed ID: 36465498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic evaluation of single-cell RNA-seq analyses performance based on long-read sequencing platforms.
Deng E; Shen Q; Zhang J; Fang Y; Chang L; Luo G; Fan X
J Adv Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38782298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shotgun metagenome data of a defined mock community using Oxford Nanopore, PacBio and Illumina technologies.
Sevim V; Lee J; Egan R; Clum A; Hundley H; Lee J; Everroad RC; Detweiler AM; Bebout BM; Pett-Ridge J; Göker M; Murray AE; Lindemann SR; Klenk HP; O'Malley R; Zane M; Cheng JF; Copeland A; Daum C; Singer E; Woyke T
Sci Data; 2019 Nov; 6(1):285. PubMed ID: 31772173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The newest Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 full-length 16S rRNA sequencing enables the accurate resolution of species-level microbial community profiling.
Zhang T; Li H; Ma S; Cao J; Liao H; Huang Q; Chen W
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 89(10):e0060523. PubMed ID: 37800969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in interrogating bacteria and fly genomes.
Tvedte ES; Gasser M; Sparklin BC; Michalski J; Hjelmen CE; Johnston JS; Zhao X; Bromley R; Tallon LJ; Sadzewicz L; Rasko DA; Dunning Hotopp JC
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33768248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Transcriptome and Epitranscriptome in Plants Using PacBio Iso-Seq and Nanopore-Based Direct RNA Sequencing.
Zhao L; Zhang H; Kohnen MV; Prasad KVSK; Gu L; Reddy ASN
Front Genet; 2019; 10():253. PubMed ID: 30949200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodologies for Transcript Profiling Using Long-Read Technologies.
Oikonomopoulos S; Bayega A; Fahiminiya S; Djambazian H; Berube P; Ragoussis J
Front Genet; 2020; 11():606. PubMed ID: 32733532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ONT and CCS sequencing technologies on the polyploid genome of a medicinal plant showed that high error rate of ONT reads are not suitable for self-correction.
Zeng P; Tian Z; Han Y; Zhang W; Zhou T; Peng Y; Hu H; Cai J
Chin Med; 2022 Aug; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 35945546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing assembly strategies for third-generation sequencing technologies across different genomes.
Espinosa E; Bautista R; Fernandez I; Larrosa R; Zapata EL; Plata O
Genomics; 2023 Sep; 115(5):110700. PubMed ID: 37598732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of structural variants detected by PacBio-CLR and ONT sequencing in pear.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Wang R; Li B; Jiang Y; Sun M; Chang Y; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):830. PubMed ID: 36517766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of assembly methods combining long-reads and short-reads to obtain
Shin SC; Choi W; Lee J; Kim HJ; Kim HW
3 Biotech; 2020 Nov; 10(11):480. PubMed ID: 33094089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Single Molecule, Real-Time Sequencing and Nanopore Sequencing for Analysis of the Size, End-Motif, and Tissue-of-Origin of Long Cell-Free DNA in Plasma.
Yu SCY; Deng J; Qiao R; Cheng SH; Peng W; Lau SL; Choy LYL; Leung TY; Wong J; Wong VW; Wong GLH; Jiang P; Chiu RWK; Chan KCA; Lo YMD
Clin Chem; 2023 Feb; 69(2):168-179. PubMed ID: 36322427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of De Novo Assembly Strategies for Bacterial Genomes.
Zhang P; Jiang D; Wang Y; Yao X; Luo Y; Yang Z
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 34299288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sequencing of individual barcoded cDNAs using Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies reveals platform-specific error patterns.
Mikheenko A; Prjibelski AD; Joglekar A; Tilgner HU
Genome Res; 2022 Apr; 32(4):726-737. PubMed ID: 35301264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
