These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28868631)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of customized implant in mandibular reconstruction after tumor resection with and without using customized surgical osteotomy guide.
    Dahake S; Kuthe A; Kulkarni S; Mawale M
    Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28868631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of customized implant and customized surgical osteotomy guide in ablative tumor surgery for accurate mandibular reconstruction.
    Dahake S; Kuthe A; Mawale M; Sapkal P; Bagde A; Daronde S; Kamble M; Sarode B
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Feb; 16(1):e2046. PubMed ID: 31675463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy.
    Narra N; Valášek J; Hannula M; Marcián P; Sándor GK; Hyttinen J; Wolff J
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):264-8. PubMed ID: 24290177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model.
    Gutwald R; Jaeger R; Lambers FM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Mar; 20(4):426-435. PubMed ID: 27887036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results.
    Roser SM; Ramachandra S; Blair H; Grist W; Carlson GW; Christensen AM; Weimer KA; Steed MB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2824-32. PubMed ID: 20828910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of accuracy and sensory outcomes of mandibular reconstruction using computer-assisted surgical simulation.
    Zhou Z; Zhao H; Zhang S; Zheng J; Yang C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 30471936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.
    Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular reconstruction system reliability analysis using probabilistic finite element method.
    Kargarnejad S; Ghalichi F; Pourgol-Mohammad M; Garajei A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Oct; 24(13):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 34657530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
    Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feasibility of a custom-made endoprosthesis in mandibular reconstruction: Implant design and finite element analysis.
    Pinheiro M; Alves JL
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2116-28. PubMed ID: 26596361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant reconstruction of a surgical defect.
    Anglis LF
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 12004731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis and clinical application of 3D-printed Ti alloy implant for the reconstruction of mandibular defects.
    Xue R; Lai Q; Xing H; Zhong C; Zhao Y; Zhu K; Deng Y; Liu C
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):95. PubMed ID: 38233785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical and Mechanostat analysis of a titanium layered porous implant for mandibular reconstruction: The effect of the topology optimization design.
    Peng WM; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Nizza M; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 May; 124():112056. PubMed ID: 33947550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
    Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of biplanar customized reconstruction plates for lateral and central segmental defects of mandible.
    Demir E; Yalçın G; Kalaycı A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 36920278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Finite element assisted study of the mechanical stability of 2 selected osteosynthesis systems for mandibular osteotomy].
    Maurer P; Holweg S; Knoll WD; Schubert J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2001 Nov; 5(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 11838037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical validation of structural optimized patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate orienting additive manufacturing.
    Zhong S; Shi Q; Van Dessel J; Gu Y; Sun Y; Yang S;
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Sep; 224():107023. PubMed ID: 35872386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.
    Chang YW; Liu PH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3167-70. PubMed ID: 24110400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of two osteosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Maurer P; Knoll WD; Schubert J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 31(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 14563328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carbon plate shows even distribution of stress, decreases screw loosening, and increases recovery of preoperative daily feed intake amount in a rabbit model of mandibular continuity defects.
    Lee SW; György S; Choi JB; Choi JY; Kim SG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24135001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.