203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28869375)
21. Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas.
Khalil W; Salle L; Bresson D; Salle H
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Mar; 165(3):677-683. PubMed ID: 36460851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Craniopharyngioma involving the infrasellar region: a case report and review of the literature.
Fujimoto Y; Matsushita H; Velasco O; Rosemberg S; Plese JP; Marino R
Pediatr Neurosurg; 2002 Oct; 37(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 12372916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Unilateral Basal interhemispheric approach through the sphenoid sinus to retrochiasmatic and intrasellar craniopharyngiomas: surgical technique and results.
Matsuo T; Kamada K; Izumo T; Nagata I
World Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 82(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 24530454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term quality of life after endonasal endoscopic resection of adult craniopharyngiomas.
Patel KS; Raza SM; McCoul ED; Patrona A; Greenfield JP; Souweidane MM; Anand VK; Schwartz TH
J Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 123(3):571-80. PubMed ID: 25884258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index.
Leng LZ; Greenfield JP; Souweidane MM; Anand VK; Schwartz TH
Neurosurgery; 2012 Jan; 70(1):110-23; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 21937943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas.
Komotar RJ; Roguski M; Bruce JN
J Neurooncol; 2009 May; 92(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 19357956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Review of the role of radiotherapy in craniopharyngiomas: how does patient age influence management decisions?
Franzone P; Berretta L; Barra S
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Apr; 19 Suppl 1():395-7. PubMed ID: 16700316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anatomic comparison of the endonasal and transpetrosal approaches for interpeduncular fossa access.
Oyama K; Prevedello DM; Ditzel Filho LF; Muto J; Gun R; Kerr EE; Otto BA; Carrau RL
Neurosurg Focus; 2014; 37(4):E12. PubMed ID: 25270131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical outcome in 90 patients with craniopharyngiomas: an evaluation of the transsphenoidal approach.
Laws ER
World Neurosurg; 2010; 74(2-3):254-5. PubMed ID: 21492549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children: meta-analysis and comparison of transcranial and transsphenoidal approaches.
Elliott RE; Jane JA; Wisoff JH
Neurosurgery; 2011 Sep; 69(3):630-43; discussion 643. PubMed ID: 21499159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients.
Cavallo LM; Frank G; Cappabianca P; Solari D; Mazzatenta D; Villa A; Zoli M; D'Enza AI; Esposito F; Pasquini E
J Neurosurg; 2014 Jul; 121(1):100-13. PubMed ID: 24785324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of craniopharyngioma: the experience at the Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome.
Caldarelli M; Massimi L; Tamburrini G; Cappa M; Di Rocco C
Childs Nerv Syst; 2005 Aug; 21(8-9):747-57. PubMed ID: 15995885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas.
Frank G; Pasquini E; Doglietto F; Mazzatenta D; Sciarretta V; Farneti G; Calbucci F
Neurosurgery; 2006 Jul; 59(1 Suppl 1):ONS75-83; discussion ONS75-83. PubMed ID: 16888556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Origin of craniopharyngiomas: implication on the growth pattern.
Wang KC; Hong SH; Kim SK; Cho BK
Childs Nerv Syst; 2005 Aug; 21(8-9):628-34. PubMed ID: 16059733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microsurgical removal of craniopharyngioma: endoscopic and transcranial techniques for complication avoidance.
Alli S; Isik S; Rutka JT
J Neurooncol; 2016 Nov; 130(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27198571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Aggressive surgery based on an anatomical subclassification of craniopharyngiomas.
Morisako H; Goto T; Goto H; Bohoun CA; Tamrakar S; Ohata K
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Dec; 41(6):E10. PubMed ID: 27903115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microscopic versus endoscopic approaches for craniopharyngiomas: choosing the optimal surgical corridor for maximizing extent of resection and complication avoidance using a personalized, tailored approach.
Liu JK; Sevak IA; Carmel PW; Eloy JA
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Dec; 41(6):E5. PubMed ID: 27903113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Safety and efficacy of the direct endonasal transsphenoidal approach for challenging sellar tumors.
Sanai N; QuiƱones-Hinojosa A; Narvid J; Kunwar S
J Neurooncol; 2008 May; 87(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 18094936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas.
Maira G; Anile C; Albanese A; Cabezas D; Pardi F; Vignati A
J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3):445-51. PubMed ID: 15035280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas.
Solari D; Morace R; Cavallo LM; Amoroso F; Cennamo G; Del Basso DE Caro M; Cappabianca P
J Neurosurg Sci; 2016 Dec; 60(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 27273221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]