172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28869633)
1. Optimal selection of dental implant for different bone conditions based on the mechanical response.
Roy S; DAS M; Chakraborty P; Biswas JK; Chatterjee S; Khutia N; Saha S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 28869633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis on the stress of the bone surrounding mini-implant with different diameters and lengths under torque.
Lu Y; Chang S; Ye J; Ye Y; Yu Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S541-5. PubMed ID: 26406046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of post dental implant fixation in drilled mandible sites.
Pirjamalineisiani A; Sarafbidabad M; Jamshidi N; Esfahani FA
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Feb; 81():159-166. PubMed ID: 28063377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical finite element analysis of self-tapping implants with different dimensions inserted in two bone qualities.
Hasan I; Heinemann F; Bourauel C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Jun; 59(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 24695023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of force distribution of loading stresses on implant-bone interface on short implant length using 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kang N; Wu YY; Gong P; Yue L; Ou GM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Nov; 118(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 25220781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area.
Lan TH; Du JK; Pan CY; Lee HE; Chung WH
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 21301903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA.
Ferreira MB; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Hipólito AC; Assunção WG
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():92-9. PubMed ID: 24411356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of residual root number and bone density on combined implant-residual tooth supported prosthesis after tooth hemisection: A finite element study.
He Y; Hasan I; Chen J; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():103-108. PubMed ID: 27471005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
