129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28869651)
1. Technical Note: Investigating the impact of field size on patient selection for the 1.5T MR-Linac.
Chuter RW; Whitehurst P; Choudhury A; van Herk M; McWilliam A
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5667-5671. PubMed ID: 28869651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of field number and beam angle on ERE for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with 1.5T MR-Linac.
Ding S; Liu H; Wang B; Li Y; Li R; Liu B; Xia Y; Huang X
Cancer Radiother; 2021 Jun; 25(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 33622638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic shielding investigation for a 6 MV in-line linac within the parallel configuration of a linac-MR system.
Santos DM; St Aubin J; Fallone BG; Steciw S
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):788-97. PubMed ID: 22320788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating the impact of patient arm position in an MR-linac on liver SBRT treatment plans.
van den Wollenberg W; de Ruiter P; Nowee ME; Jansen EPM; Sonke JJ; Fast MF
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5144-5151. PubMed ID: 31529694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a simplified optimizer for MR-guided adaptive RT in case of pancreatic cancer.
Cusumano D; Boldrini L; Menna S; Teodoli S; Placidi E; Chiloiro G; Placidi L; Greco F; Stimato G; Cellini F; Valentini V; Azario L; De Spirito M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):20-30. PubMed ID: 31444952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of radiation induced current on the quality of MR images in an integrated linac-MR system.
Burke B; Wachowicz K; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6139-47. PubMed ID: 23039653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of a 1.5 T MR-Linac full accelerator head and cryostat model for Monte Carlo dose simulations.
Friedel M; Nachbar M; Mönnich D; Dohm O; Thorwarth D
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5304-5313. PubMed ID: 31532829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac.
Ng-Cheng-Hin B; Nutting C; Newbold K; Bhide S; McQuaid D; Dunlop A; Harrington K; Wong KH
Br J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 93(1111):20200023. PubMed ID: 32436787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A planning-based feasibility study of MR-Linac treatment for anal cancer radiation therapy.
Smith D; Knight K; Sim J; Lim Joon D; Foroudi F; Khoo V
Med Dosim; 2023 Winter; 48(4):267-272. PubMed ID: 37507334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of using a dual isocentre technique for treating cervical cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac.
Chuter RW; Brewster F; Retout L; Cree A; Aktürk N; Hales R; Benson R; Hoskin P; McWilliam A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 68(2):. PubMed ID: 36549006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of longitudinal magnetic fields on a simulated in-line 6 MV linac.
St Aubin J; Santos DM; Steciw S; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4916-23. PubMed ID: 20964210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A daily end-to-end quality assurance workflow for MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy on MR-Linac.
Chen X; Ahunbay E; Paulson ES; Chen G; Li XA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):205-212. PubMed ID: 31799753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.
O'Brien DJ; Dolan J; Pencea S; Schupp N; Sawakuchi GO
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):884-897. PubMed ID: 29178457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional EPID dosimetry for an MR-linac: Proof of concept.
Torres-Xirau I; Olaciregui-Ruiz I; van der Heide UA; Mans A
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):4193-4203. PubMed ID: 31199521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.
Wooten HO; Green O; Yang M; DeWees T; Kashani R; Olsen J; Michalski J; Yang D; Tanderup K; Hu Y; Li HH; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 26104932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: End-to-end verification of an MR-Linac using a dynamic motion phantom.
Liu X; Li C; Zhu J; Gong G; Sun H; Li X; Sun M; Zhang Z; Li B; Yin Y; Li Z
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5479-5489. PubMed ID: 34174099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment.
Winkel D; Bol GH; Werensteijn-Honingh AM; Intven MPW; Eppinga WSC; Hes J; Snoeren LMW; Sikkes GG; Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk CGM; Raaymakers BW; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Kroon PS
Radiother Oncol; 2020 May; 146():118-125. PubMed ID: 32146257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First MR images obtained during megavoltage photon irradiation from a prototype integrated linac-MR system.
Fallone BG; Murray B; Rathee S; Stanescu T; Steciw S; Vidakovic S; Blosser E; Tymofichuk D
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2084-8. PubMed ID: 19610297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac.
Onal C; Efe E; Bozca R; Yavas C; Yavas G; Arslan G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14179. PubMed ID: 38013636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
