561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28870163)
1. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway insertion requires a lower concentration of sevoflurane than ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled remifentanil infusion: a prospective randomised controlled study.
Monteserín-Matesanz C; González T; Anadón-Baselga MJ; Zaballos M
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):5. PubMed ID: 31910822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.
Arslan Zİ; Balcı C; Oysu DA; Yılmaz M; Gürbüz N; Ilce Z
Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing I-Gel to Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study.
Oba S; Türk HŞ; Kılınç L; Ekşioğlu Karacı B; İslamoğlu S
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2020 Aug; 48(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 32864646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway.
Wong DT; Yang JJ; Jagannathan N
Can J Anaesth; 2012 May; 59(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 22318376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients: A randomised controlled trial.
Kim MH; Lee JH; Choi YS; Park S; Shin S
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2018 Aug; 35(8):598-604. PubMed ID: 28857785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
Lee AK; Tey JB; Lim Y; Sia AT
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep; 37(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 19775047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients.
Hoşten T; Gürkan Y; Kuş A; Özdamar D; Aksu C; Solak M; Toker K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of blind intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask FASTRACH™ and the intubating laryngeal mask Ambu Aura-i™ a prospective randomised clinical trial.
Schiewe R; Stoeck M; Gruenewald M; Hoecker J; Bein B
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):44. PubMed ID: 30927922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal for laryngopharyngeal trauma and postoperative morbidity in children.
Aydogmus MT; Eksioglu B; Oba S; Unsal O; Türk HS; Sinikoglu SN; Tug A
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2013; 63(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 24565340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS).
Mudakanagoudar MS; Santhosh MC
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 26768926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
