161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28870196)
1. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.
Bojke L; Soares M; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples L; Taylor A
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(37):1-124. PubMed ID: 34105510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reference Case Methods for Expert Elicitation in Health Care Decision Making.
Bojke L; Soares MO; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples LD; Taylor A
Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 34271832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Remote, real-time expert elicitation to determine the prior probability distribution for Bayesian sample size determination in international randomised controlled trials: Bronchiolitis in Infants Placebo Versus Epinephrine and Dexamethasone (BIPED) study.
Lan J; Plint AC; Dalziel SR; Klassen TP; Offringa M; Heath A;
Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):279. PubMed ID: 35410375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert Elicitation to Inform a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Renal Cancer.
Rossi SH; Blick C; Nathan P; Nicol D; Stewart GD; Wilson ECF
Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):981-987. PubMed ID: 31511187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eliciting uncertainty for complex parameters in model-based economic evaluations: quantifying a temporal change in the treatment effect.
Jankovic D; Payne K; Kanaan M; Bojke L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Feb; 38(1):e21. PubMed ID: 35177145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. USING EXPERT OPINION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A GUIDELINE REVIEW.
Hunger T; Schnell-Inderst P; Sahakyan N; Siebert U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 27502308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the Feasibility of Comprehensive Uncertainty Assessment in Health Economic Modeling: A Case Study.
Petersohn S; Grimm SE; Ramaekers BLT; Ten Cate-Hoek AJ; Joore MA
Value Health; 2021 Jul; 24(7):983-994. PubMed ID: 34243842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.
Morgan MG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(20):7176-84. PubMed ID: 24821779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Nov; 31(11):991-1003. PubMed ID: 24105473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of expert knowledge in evaluating costs and benefits of alternative service provisions: a case study.
Garthwaite PH; Chilcott JB; Jenkinson DJ; Tappenden P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 18601804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the effect of expert elicitation techniques on population status assessment in the face of large uncertainty.
Moore JF; Martin J; Waddle H; Campbell Grant EH; Fleming J; Bohnett E; Akre TSB; Brown DJ; Jones MT; Meck JR; Oxenrider K; Tur A; Willey LL; Johnson F
J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 306():114453. PubMed ID: 35033890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.
Cadham CJ; Knoll M; Sánchez-Romero LM; Cummings KM; Douglas CE; Liber A; Mendez D; Meza R; Mistry R; Sertkaya A; Travis N; Levy DT
Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):684-703. PubMed ID: 34694168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating expert opinion with clinical trial data to extrapolate long-term survival: a case study of CAR-T therapy for children and young adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Cope S; Ayers D; Zhang J; Batt K; Jansen JP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):182. PubMed ID: 31477025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supporting patients treated for prostate cancer: a video vignette study with an email-based educational program in general practice.
Jiwa M; Halkett G; Meng X; Pillai V; Berg M; Shaw T
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Feb; 16(2):e63. PubMed ID: 24571952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for extending trial design to facilitate missing data sensitivity analyses.
Mason AJ; Grieve RD; Richards-Belle A; Mouncey PR; Harrison DA; Carpenter JR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32183708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation.
Peel A; Jenks M; Choudhury M; Lovett R; Rejon-Parrilla JC; Sims A; Craig J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 16(6):819-836. PubMed ID: 30073485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
