210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28870380)
1. Active learning reduces annotation time for clinical concept extraction.
Kholghi M; Sitbon L; Zuccon G; Nguyen A
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Oct; 106():25-31. PubMed ID: 28870380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active learning: a step towards automating medical concept extraction.
Kholghi M; Sitbon L; Zuccon G; Nguyen A
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 26253132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted annotation of medical free text using RapTAT.
Gobbel GT; Garvin J; Reeves R; Cronin RM; Heavirland J; Williams J; Weaver A; Jayaramaraja S; Giuse D; Speroff T; Brown SH; Xu H; Matheny ME
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(5):833-41. PubMed ID: 24431336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of active learning methods for named entity recognition in clinical text.
Chen Y; Lasko TA; Mei Q; Denny JC; Xu H
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58():11-18. PubMed ID: 26385377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-aware active learning for named entity recognition in clinical text.
Wei Q; Chen Y; Salimi M; Denny JC; Mei Q; Lasko TA; Chen Q; Wu S; Franklin A; Cohen T; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 31294792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and evaluation of RapTAT: a machine learning system for concept mapping of phrases from medical narratives.
Gobbel GT; Reeves R; Jayaramaraja S; Giuse D; Speroff T; Brown SH; Elkin PL; Matheny ME
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():54-65. PubMed ID: 24316051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying active learning to assertion classification of concepts in clinical text.
Chen Y; Mani S; Xu H
J Biomed Inform; 2012 Apr; 45(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 22127105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task definition, annotated dataset, and supervised natural language processing models for symptom extraction from unstructured clinical notes.
Steinkamp JM; Bala W; Sharma A; Kantrowitz JJ
J Biomed Inform; 2020 Feb; 102():103354. PubMed ID: 31838210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accelerating the annotation of sparse named entities by dynamic sentence selection.
Tsuruoka Y; Tsujii J; Ananiadou S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S8. PubMed ID: 19025694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Leveraging rich annotations to improve learning of medical concepts from clinical free text.
Yu S; Farooq F; Krishnapuram B; Rao B
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():1603-11. PubMed ID: 22195226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the impact of pre-annotation on annotation speed and potential bias: natural language processing gold standard development for clinical named entity recognition in clinical trial announcements.
Lingren T; Deleger L; Molnar K; Zhai H; Meinzen-Derr J; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Li Q; Solti I
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 24001514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semi-automatic semantic annotation of PubMed queries: a study on quality, efficiency, satisfaction.
Névéol A; Islamaj Doğan R; Lu Z
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Apr; 44(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 21094696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreAtIvE and GOA.
Camon EB; Barrell DG; Dimmer EC; Lee V; Magrane M; Maslen J; Binns D; Apweiler R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17. PubMed ID: 15960829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of fine-grained annotations in supervised recognition of risk factors for heart disease from EHRs.
Roberts K; Shooshan SE; Rodriguez L; Abhyankar S; Kilicoglu H; Demner-Fushman D
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58 Suppl(Suppl):S111-S119. PubMed ID: 26122527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the effects of machine pre-annotation and an interactive annotation interface on manual de-identification of clinical text.
South BR; Mowery D; Suo Y; Leng J; Ferrández Ó; Meystre SM; Chapman WW
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Aug; 50():162-72. PubMed ID: 24859155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Text Data in Machine Learning: Systematic Review.
Spasic I; Nenadic G
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e17984. PubMed ID: 32229465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A machine learning based approach to identify protected health information in Chinese clinical text.
Du L; Xia C; Deng Z; Lu G; Xia S; Ma J
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Aug; 116():24-32. PubMed ID: 29887232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Community annotation experiment for ground truth generation for the i2b2 medication challenge.
Uzuner O; Solti I; Xia F; Cadag E
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2010; 17(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 20819855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Study of Concept Extraction Across Different Types of Clinical Notes.
Kim Y; Riloff E; Hurdle JF
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():737-46. PubMed ID: 26958209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MCN: A comprehensive corpus for medical concept normalization.
Luo YF; Sun W; Rumshisky A
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Apr; 92():103132. PubMed ID: 30802545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
