706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28871799)
1. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).
van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Verhage RJ; Besselink MG; Prins MJ; Haverkamp L; Schippers C; Rinkes IH; Joore HC; Ten Kate FJ; Koffijberg H; Kroese CC; van Leeuwen MS; Lolkema MP; Reerink O; Schipper ME; Steenhagen E; Vleggaar FP; Voest EE; Siersema PD; van Hillegersberg R
Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():230. PubMed ID: 23199187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Liu Y; Li JJ; Zu P; Liu HX; Yu ZW; Ren Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 23(45):8035-8043. PubMed ID: 29259379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures.
Nguyen NT; Roberts P; Follette DM; Rivers R; Wolfe BM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Dec; 197(6):902-13. PubMed ID: 14644277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhao Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 12(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 21186282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience and result of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy.
Sunpaweravong S; Chewatanakornkul S; Ruangsin S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Aug; 91(8):1202-5. PubMed ID: 18788691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: early experience and outcomes.
Senkowski CK; Adams MT; Beck AN; Brower ST
Am Surg; 2006 Aug; 72(8):677-83; discussion 683. PubMed ID: 16913309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term outcomes after transition from Sweet to thoracoscopic esophagectomy: Our experience and cost analysis.
Yao F; Yao J; Hang FR; Cao S; Qian JL; Wang J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(Supplement):S167-S172. PubMed ID: 29578168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome and costs of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial learning curve vs laparotomy.
Tan CL; Zhang H; Peng B; Li KZ
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5311-9. PubMed ID: 25954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning curves of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.
Song SY; Na KJ; Oh SG; Ahn BH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):689-93. PubMed ID: 19144531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
Yao F; Wang J; Yao J; Xu L; Qian J; Cao Y
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():105-109. PubMed ID: 29061388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Lee L; Sudarshan M; Li C; Latimer E; Fried GM; Mulder DS; Feldman LS; Ferri LE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):3732-9. PubMed ID: 23838923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Cost for Robotic vs "Non-Robotic" Transhiatal Esophagectomy.
Ross SB; Rayman S; Thomas J; Peek G; Crespo K; Syblis C; Sucandy I; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(3):389-393. PubMed ID: 34794333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Avery KN; Metcalfe C; Berrisford R; Barham CP; Donovan JL; Elliott J; Falk SJ; Goldin R; Hanna G; Hollowood AA; Krysztopik R; Noble S; Sanders G; Streets CG; Titcomb DR; Wheatley T; Blazeby JM
Trials; 2014 Jun; 15():200. PubMed ID: 24888266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
