390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28871806)
1. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography.
Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Project ScanVan: Mobile mammography services to decrease socioeconomic barriers and racial disparities among medically underserved women in NYC.
Tsapatsaris A; Reichman M
Clin Imaging; 2021 Oct; 78():60-63. PubMed ID: 33770557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening at stationary versus mobile units in BreastScreen Norway.
Holen Å; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Aase H; Hopland NM; Pedersen K; Larsen M; Tsuruda KM; Hofvind S
J Med Screen; 2020 Mar; 27(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 31554445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
Peek ME; Han J
J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.
Sharpe RE; Venkataraman S; Phillips J; Dialani V; Fein-Zachary VJ; Prakash S; Slanetz PJ; Mehta TS
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 26458206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis for the breast cancer screening among urban populations in China, 2012-2013].
Mi ZH; Ren JS; Zhang HZ; Li J; Wang Y; Fang Y; Shi JF; Zhang K; Zhao JB; Dai M
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 50(10):887-892. PubMed ID: 27686767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations.
Hunt KA; Rosen EL; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10430120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Primary Care Physician Interaction on Longitudinal Adherence to Screening Mammography Across Different Racial/Ethnic Groups.
Flores EJ; López D; Miles RC; Glover M; Lehman CD; Harvey HB; Narayan AK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):908-914. PubMed ID: 30737162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?
Vyas A; Madhavan S; Kelly K; Metzger A; Schreiman J; Remick S
J Community Health; 2013 Aug; 38(4):698-706. PubMed ID: 23504266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units.
Haikel RL; Mauad EC; Silva TB; Mattos JS; Chala LF; Longatto-Filho A; de Barros N
BMC Womens Health; 2012 Oct; 12():32. PubMed ID: 23031787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobile mammography in underserved populations: analysis of outcomes of 3,923 women.
Brooks SE; Hembree TM; Shelton BJ; Beache SC; Aschbacher G; Schervish PH; Dignan MB
J Community Health; 2013 Oct; 38(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 23674194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]