BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28871806)

  • 1. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
    Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
    Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Project ScanVan: Mobile mammography services to decrease socioeconomic barriers and racial disparities among medically underserved women in NYC.
    Tsapatsaris A; Reichman M
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Oct; 78():60-63. PubMed ID: 33770557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
    Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening at stationary versus mobile units in BreastScreen Norway.
    Holen Å; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Aase H; Hopland NM; Pedersen K; Larsen M; Tsuruda KM; Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2020 Mar; 27(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 31554445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
    Peek ME; Han J
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.
    Sharpe RE; Venkataraman S; Phillips J; Dialani V; Fein-Zachary VJ; Prakash S; Slanetz PJ; Mehta TS
    Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 26458206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analysis for the breast cancer screening among urban populations in China, 2012-2013].
    Mi ZH; Ren JS; Zhang HZ; Li J; Wang Y; Fang Y; Shi JF; Zhang K; Zhao JB; Dai M
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 50(10):887-892. PubMed ID: 27686767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations.
    Hunt KA; Rosen EL; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10430120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Primary Care Physician Interaction on Longitudinal Adherence to Screening Mammography Across Different Racial/Ethnic Groups.
    Flores EJ; López D; Miles RC; Glover M; Lehman CD; Harvey HB; Narayan AK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):908-914. PubMed ID: 30737162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
    Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
    Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?
    Vyas A; Madhavan S; Kelly K; Metzger A; Schreiman J; Remick S
    J Community Health; 2013 Aug; 38(4):698-706. PubMed ID: 23504266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
    Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units.
    Haikel RL; Mauad EC; Silva TB; Mattos JS; Chala LF; Longatto-Filho A; de Barros N
    BMC Womens Health; 2012 Oct; 12():32. PubMed ID: 23031787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile mammography in underserved populations: analysis of outcomes of 3,923 women.
    Brooks SE; Hembree TM; Shelton BJ; Beache SC; Aschbacher G; Schervish PH; Dignan MB
    J Community Health; 2013 Oct; 38(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 23674194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.