These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28872571)
21. Clinical and radiographic comparison of a hybrid cage glenoid to a cemented polyethylene glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Friedman RJ; Cheung E; Grey SG; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):2308-2316. PubMed ID: 31324502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical comparison of zoned-conformity glenoid versus standard glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty: impact on rotator cuff strain and glenohumeral translation. Wright MA; Abbasi P; Murthi AM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7S):S109-S115. PubMed ID: 33774167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rotator cuff contact pressures at the tendon-implant interface after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a metal-backed glenoid component. Thomas R; Richardson M; Patel M; Page R; Sangeux M; Ackland DC J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2085-2092. PubMed ID: 29954661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical and radiographic outcomes with a posteriorly augmented glenoid for Walch B glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Grey SG; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP; Friedman RJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):e185-e195. PubMed ID: 31924515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Midterm results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a third-generation implant. Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; Tahal DS; Mijc D; DeVito P; Motisi M J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 30472054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Humeral and glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty : Classification and treatment principles]. Gohlke F; Werner B Orthopade; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 29063145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical and radiological outcomes of 17 reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases performed after failed humeral head resurfacing. Gaeremynck P; Amouyel T; Saab M; Gadisseux B; Soudy K; Szymanski C; Maynou C Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 105(8):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 31548154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of Glenosphere and baseplate parameters on Glenoid bone strains in reverse shoulder Arthroplasty. Pauzenberger L; Dwyer C; Obopilwe E; Nowak MD; Cote M; Romeo AA; Mazzocca AD; Dyrna F BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):587. PubMed ID: 31805924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Glenohumeral mismatch affects micromotion of cemented glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. Sabesan VJ; Ackerman J; Sharma V; Baker KC; Kurdziel MD; Wiater JM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 May; 24(5):814-22. PubMed ID: 25487898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proximal humeral osteolysis and glenoid radiolucent lines in an anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of a ceramic and a metal humeral head component. Bell SN; Christmas MUSI; Coghlan JA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):913-923. PubMed ID: 31899093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study. Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Progressive glenoid bone loss caused by erosion in humeral head resurfacing. Werner BS; Stehle J; Abdelkawi A; Plumhoff P; Hudek R; Gohlke F Orthopade; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1028-1033. PubMed ID: 29063146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up. Zilber S; Camana E; Lapner P; Haritinian E; Nove Josserand L Int Orthop; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2159-2164. PubMed ID: 29582118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of glenoid implant design on glenohumeral stability: an experimental study. Sins L; Tétreault P; Petit Y; Nuño N; Billuart F; Hagemeister N Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Oct; 27(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 22626997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival of stemless humeral head replacement in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. Magosch P; Lichtenberg S; Habermeyer P J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):e343-e355. PubMed ID: 33144222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Management of the subscapularis tendon during total shoulder arthroplasty. Shields E; Ho A; Wiater JM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Apr; 26(4):723-731. PubMed ID: 28111182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency. Rangarajan R; Blout CK; Patel VV; Bastian SA; Lee BK; Itamura JM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S139-S148. PubMed ID: 32643608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Kinematic impact of size on the existing glenohumeral joint in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Cabezas AF; Gutiérrez S; Teusink MJ; Schwartz DG; Hartzler RU; Santoni BG; Frankle MA Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Jun; 29(6):622-8. PubMed ID: 24874642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The association between glenoid component design and revision risk in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Dillon MT; Chan PH; Prentice HA; Burfeind WE; Yian EH; Singh A; Paxton EW; Navarro RA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2089-2096. PubMed ID: 32507730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]